Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles Reappraised

Marc B. Shapiro is a scholar of Jewish intellectual history, and this Littman Library of Jewish Civilization book is his academic study questioning the doctrinal status of Maimonides' Thirteen Principles of Jewish faith, examining how variously they were actually received, debated and in places rejected across later rabbinic history rather than treated as settled dogma from the start. Its strength is close engagement with the rabbinic textual record to show genuine historical diversity of opinion on principles now sometimes assumed to be uncontroversial. Its limit is that it is a historical study of reception and debate specifically, so a claim about the Thirteen Principles' own original meaning as Maimonides intended them needs a source focused on Maimonides' own text and context rather than this later reception history.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Marc Shapiro's Littman Library of Jewish Civilization study questioning the doctrinal status of Maimonides's Thirteen Principles of Jewish faith.
Notes
Shapiro's historical study questioning the doctrinal status of Maimonides' Thirteen Principles of Jewish faith.
Citation
Author
Marc B. Shapiro
Publisher
Littman Library of Jewish Civilization
Publication Year
2004
Source Type
Scholarly work
Connections

Associated With

Maimonides, Figures

This source names Maimonides directly: "questioning the doctrinal status of Maimonides' Thirteen Principles of Jewish faith, examining how variously they were actually received, debated and in places rejected across later rabbinic history..."

Source The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles ReappraisedMarc B. Shapiro
Claims Backed By This Source (44 claims)

This source backs 44 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 11 holds, 1 connected. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 11 claims: 2 well-attested, 6 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Creeds & Confessions, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Denominations, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Religious Legal Instruments, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

3
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.