Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Lovelorn Ghost and the Magical Monk: Practicing Buddhism in Modern Thailand

Justin Thomas McDaniel's The Lovelorn Ghost and the Magical Monk, Practicing Buddhism in Modern Thailand, published by Columbia University Press in 2011, is a scholarly ethnographic study of lived, everyday Thai Buddhist practice, ghost belief, amulet use and the popular veneration of specific monks, arguing against textbook accounts that treat Thai Buddhism as primarily a matter of doctrine and meditation. McDaniel conducted extended fieldwork in Thailand and reads vernacular, non-canonical religious materials alongside his observation. Its strength is that grounding in what people actually do rather than in normative textual Buddhism. Its limit is that an ethnography of contemporary practice describes a particular time and set of communities, so a claim about historical Thai Buddhism, or about doctrine as taught in monastic education, needs a different kind of source than this study of lived popular practice.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Justin Thomas McDaniel's The Lovelorn Ghost and the Magical Monk, published by Columbia University Press in 2011, is a scholarly ethnographic study grounded in McDaniel's own extended fieldwork in Thailand, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Justin McDaniel's scholarly study of practicing Buddhism in modern Thailand.
Citation
Author
Justin Thomas McDaniel
Publisher
Columbia University Press
Publication Year
2011
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

Thailand, Countries

This source names Thailand directly: "Monk, Practicing Buddhism in Modern Thailand, published by Columbia University Press in 2011, is a scholarly ethnographic study of lived, everyday Thai Buddhist practice, ghost belief, amulet use..."

Source The Lovelorn Ghost and the Magical Monk: Practicing Buddhism in Modern ThailandJustin Thomas McDaniel
Claims Backed By This Source (32 claims)

This source backs 32 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Figures, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Connected

1

General References

5

Cities

Empires & Polities

Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.