Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Mandaean Book of John: Critical Edition, Translation and Commentary

The Mandaean Book of John: Critical Edition, Translation and Commentary, edited and translated by Charles G. Haberl and James F. McGrath, De Gruyter 2020, is the first English-language critical edition of this Mandaean scripture devoted to Yahya Yuhana. Its strength is that it is a peer-reviewed critical edition from a major academic publisher, more specific and more current than the general account already in the catalogue. Its limit is that Mandaic textual scholarship is a small specialist field, so a claim resting on a disputed reading should note that few independent scholars work directly with the language.

Facts
Citation
Author
Charles G. Haberl and James F. McGrath (eds. and trans.)
Publisher
De Gruyter
Publication Year
2020
URL
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110487862/html
Source Type
Critical edition
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a peer reviewed critical edition from a major academic publisher, De Gruyter, the first English language critical edition of its kind, though drawn from a small specialist field.
Notes
The first English language critical edition, translation and scholarly commentary of the Mandaean scripture devoted to Yahya Yuhana, distinct from and more specific than Buckley's general account, already the live source.
Connections

Associated With

John, Figures

This source names John directly: "The Mandaean Book of John: Critical Edition, Translation and Commentary, edited and translated by Charles G."

Source The Mandaean Book of John: Critical Edition, Translation and CommentaryCharles G. Haberl and James F. McGrath (eds. and trans.)
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)

This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.