Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Nag Hammadi Library in English

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The standard one-volume English translation of the complete Nag Hammadi find, produced by the Coptic Gnostic Library Project with James M. Robinson as general editor, each tractate introduced by its own translator. The third, completely revised edition added an afterword surveying scholarship since the first 1977 printing.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by HarperSanFrancisco as James M. Robinson's standard scholarly edition and translation of the Nag Hammadi texts, assembled and reviewed by an internationally recognized team of specialists, the established academic reference translation for the field.
Notes
A peer-reviewed scholarly translation produced by the Coptic Gnostic Library Project, each tractate introduced by its own specialist translator; reliable as the translated text and its scholarly framing, not as one unified interpretive voice across the whole collection, since each introduction carries its own contributor's judgment. Use for the translated content of any Nag Hammadi tractate, including the Gospel of Truth (Attridge and MacRae's introduction and translation).
Citation
Author
James M. Robinson (general editor)
Publisher
HarperSanFrancisco
Publication Year
1990
URL
https://archive.org/details/naghammadilibrar0000unse_u3z6
Source Type
book
Claims Backed By This Source (51 claims)

This source backs 51 claims across the atlas. As facts: 37 well-attested, 5 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Emanations, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 12 claims: 6 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.