The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics, an entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy by Mark Murphy, first published 23 September 2002 and last substantively revised 30 April 2025, is a peer-reviewed academic reference article surveying the natural law tradition in moral philosophy from its classical and scholastic roots to contemporary debate. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a rigorously peer-reviewed academic reference maintained by working philosophers, distinct from a general crowd-edited encyclopedia, and its living-document model means entries like this one are periodically revised to reflect current scholarship rather than left static. Cite it as a reliable survey of the philosophical debate, not as a statement of any one religious tradition's own doctrine.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Mark Murphy's Natural Law Tradition in Ethics entry for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, first published 2002 and last substantively revised 2025, the middle tier reflecting a rigorously peer reviewed academic reference maintained by working philosophers, distinct from a general crowd edited encyclopedia, whose living document model means entries are periodically revised to reflect current scholarship. Cite it as a reliable survey of the philosophical debate, not as a statement of any one religious tradition's own doctrine. NotesStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published September 23, 2002; last substantive revision April 30, 2025, author and dates confirmed directly against the entry.
Citation
AuthorMark Murphy
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year2002
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Historical Figures, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.