Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The origins of two purportedly pre-Columbian Mexican crystal skulls

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Margaret Sax, Jane M. Walsh, Ian C. Freestone, Andrew H. Bevan and Nigel D. Meeks are researchers in archaeological science, and this peer reviewed Journal of Archaeological Science article reports their scanning electron microscope tool mark analysis and quartz source study of the British Museum and Smithsonian crystal skulls purportedly of pre-Columbian Mexican origin. Its strength is that it is peer reviewed physical analysis with reproducible methods, and it concludes the skulls were manufactured with modern rotary tools, not by pre-Columbian craft. Its limit is that it examines these two specific specimens, so a claim about a different crystal skull's authenticity needs its own independent physical analysis rather than an extension of this finding.

Facts
Citation
Author
Margaret Sax, Jane M. Walsh, Ian C. Freestone, Andrew H. Bevan, Nigel D. Meeks
Publisher
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publication Year
2008
URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.007
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published in the peer reviewed Journal of Archaeological Science, Sax, Walsh, Freestone, Bevan and Meeks' report of reproducible scanning electron microscope tool mark analysis, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed physical science.
Notes
SEM tool-mark and quartz-source analysis of the British Museum and Smithsonian skulls; concludes modern rotary-tool manufacture.
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Artifacts & Relics, 10 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Custodians & Museums, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.

Popular myth - corrected

1

Artifacts & Relics

Holds

5

Artifacts & Relics

General References

3

Artifacts & Relics

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.