Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoard and Votive Deposits

Richard Bradley's The Passage of Arms, An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoard and Votive Deposits, published by Cambridge University Press in 1990, is a scholarly archaeological study analyzing the deliberate deposit of weapons and other valuable objects in rivers, bogs and other watery or liminal places across prehistoric Europe, arguing these hoards represent intentional ritual offering rather than accidental loss or simple hidden storage. Bradley is an archaeologist working from the excavated material record itself, comparing deposit patterns across many sites. Its strength is that comparative, pattern based method, using the consistency of where and how objects were deposited across many separate finds to argue for ritual intent rather than resting the case on any single dramatic example. Its limit is that interpreting intent from material remains alone is inherently inferential, no depositor left a written explanation, so the ritual reading, while well argued, remains an archaeological interpretation rather than a directly attested fact.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Richard Bradley's The Passage of Arms, published by Cambridge University Press in 1990, is a peer reviewed archaeological study using comparative deposit patterns across many prehistoric sites, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Richard Bradley's archaeological study of prehistoric hoard and votive weapon deposits.
Citation
Author
Richard Bradley
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1990
Source Type
book
Connections

Associated With

Europe, Continents

This source names Europe directly: "or liminal places across prehistoric Europe, arguing these hoards represent intentional ritual offering rather than accidental loss or simple hidden storage."

Source The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoard and Votive DepositsRichard Bradley
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Bodies of Water, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Historical Periods, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.