William Claxton Peppe's The Piprahwa Stupa, Containing Relics of Buddha, published in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society in 1898 with an accompanying note by the Indologist Vincent A. Smith, is Peppe's own primary excavation report describing his discovery of the stupa, its stone reliquary coffer and its contents on his Birdpur estate in what is now Uttar Pradesh. Its strength is that it is the excavator's contemporaneous first hand account, published promptly in a leading learned society journal with an independent scholar's supporting note, rather than a later reconstruction. Its limit is that 1898 excavation and recording standards fell well short of modern archaeological practice, so specific claims about stratigraphy or precise findspot detail should be checked against later archaeological reassessment of the site rather than taken as definitive from the original report alone.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
William Claxton Peppe's excavation report, published in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society in 1898 with an accompanying note by the Indologist Vincent A. Smith, is the excavator's own contemporaneous primary account published promptly in a leading learned society journal, treated at the top tier. NotesWilliam Peppe's own 1898 excavation report on the Piprahwa Stupa and its relics of the Buddha, published in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.
Citation
AuthorWilliam Claxton Peppe (with a note by Vincent A. Smith)
PublisherJournal of the Royal Asiatic Society
Publication Year1898
Source TypePrimary excavation report
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.