Philip G. Kreyenbroek held the chair of Iranian Studies at the University of Gottingen and is one of the foremost specialists in the religions of the Kurdish speaking world, having written the standard academic study of Yazidism as well as this 2022 article on the Yarsan. It appeared in Oral Tradition, the peer reviewed journal hosted by the Center for Studies in Oral Tradition, a specialist venue for exactly the kind of question this article answers: how a religious literature transmitted partly by memory and partly by manuscript actually holds together. The article draws on his own fieldwork and on the wider academic literature on the Yarsan to describe the kalams, their layers and their transmission through Sayyed lineages, rather than restating secondary summaries, which is why the atlas treats it as primary evidence for how Yarsani textual transmission works rather than only for the facts it reports.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Philip Kreyenbroek's peer reviewed article on the Yarsan (Ahl-e Haqq) religious textual heritage, on the kalam corpus, its Perdiwari layer and its transmission through Sayyed lineages, drawn from the author's own fieldwork rather than a secondary summary. NotesPeer reviewed article on the kalam corpus, its Perdiwari layer and its transmission through Sayyed lineages, drawn from the author's own fieldwork and reading rather than a secondary summary. Use for how Yarsani textual transmission works, not only for the facts it reports.
Citation
AuthorPhilip G. Kreyenbroek
PublisherOral Tradition, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 331-340
Publication Year2022
URLhttps://oraltradition.org/the-religious-textual-heritage-of-the-yarsan-ahl-e-haqq/
Source TypeJournal article
Claims Backed By This Source (76 claims)
This source backs 76 claims across the atlas. As facts: 57 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 2 connected. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 22 claims: 16 well-attested, 2 connected, 4 general references.
- Open Questions, 16 claims: 13 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Religions, 11 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 open question, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.