The Return of the Ahayu:da, Lessons for Repatriation from Zuni Pueblo and the Smithsonian Institution, by William L. Merrill, Edmund J. Ladd and T. J. Ferguson, published in Current Anthropology in 1993, is a peer reviewed case study, co-authored with a Zuni cultural specialist, of the Smithsonian's 1978 return of sacred war god effigies to Zuni Pueblo, among the earliest and most influential repatriation cases predating the federal NAGPRA law. Its strength is exactly that co-authorship, combining the Smithsonian's own institutional account of the negotiation with Ladd's standing as a Zuni cultural expert, giving the case study a perspective from both sides of the repatriation rather than only the museum's. Its limit is that it examines one specific, relatively cooperative case from the 1970s, so a claim about repatriation disputes generally, including the more contested cases NAGPRA later had to adjudicate, needs sources engaging that wider and often less cooperative pattern directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Tier one: a peer reviewed case study in Current Anthropology, co authored with a Zuni cultural specialist, giving the Smithsonian's early repatriation case a perspective from both sides of the negotiation. Its limit is that it examines one relatively cooperative case from the 1970s, so a claim about the more contested disputes NAGPRA later adjudicated needs sources engaging that wider pattern directly. NotesBy the Smithsonian curator, the Zuni anthropologist and the Pueblo's own consulting anthropologist who negotiated it: the definitive account of the 1987 repatriation of the Ahayu:da (war gods) from the Smithsonian to Zuni Pueblo after nine years of negotiation. Squarely the fact's own Zuni Ahayu:da claim.
Citation
AuthorWilliam L. Merrill, Edmund J. Ladd and T. J. Ferguson
PublisherCurrent Anthropology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 523-567 (University of Chicago Press)
Publication Year1993
URLhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/204205
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religions, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
14Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
4Myths & Sacred Narratives
Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.