Bhikkhu Analayo's article in the Journal of Buddhist Ethics, volume 20, 2013, is a peer-reviewed scholarly study of the revival of the bhikkhuni, or Buddhist nuns', ordination lineage and of the argument that its earlier lapse threatens the decline of the sasana, the Buddhist teaching and community. Analayo is a recognized textual scholar of early Buddhism whose work on the nuns' order is repeatedly cited across the field. Its limit is that it is a single scholarly article making a textual and historical argument, not an ethnographic account of how the revival is actually being received or resisted within specific monastic communities today, which needs a separate, more contemporary source.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published in the Journal of Buddhist Ethics, volume 20, 2013, Bhikkhu Analayo's peer reviewed article by a recognized textual scholar of early Buddhism repeatedly cited across the field, treated at the top tier. NotesBhikkhu Analayo's scholarly article on the revival of the bhikkhuni (Buddhist nuns') ordination lineage and the decline of the sasana.
Citation
AuthorBhikkhu Analayo
PublisherJournal of Buddhist Ethics
Volume 20, 2013. Publication Year2013
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Denominations, 4 claims: 1 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 2 general references.
- Doctrines, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Religious Roles & Titles, 4 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Rituals, 2 claims: 2 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
- Scriptures & Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.