Sources
The Satapatha Brahmana
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Satapatha Brahmana, Julius Eggeling's translation published by Clarendon Press, Oxford, beginning in 1882 as part of the Sacred Books of the East series, is the standard nineteenth century scholarly English translation of this major Vedic prose text on ritual. Eggeling was a recognized Sanskritist and the translation's authority rests on that philological training within a landmark academic series edited by Max Muller. Its limit is its age: later Vedic ritual scholarship has refined specific interpretations, and Eggeling's Victorian prose can obscure technical ritual detail. Cite it as a standard accessible translation of the text; a disputed interpretive point needs a modern specialist study.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Julius Eggeling's translation, published by Clarendon Press, Oxford as part of the Sacred Books of the East series, is the standard nineteenth century scholarly English translation of this major Vedic text, treated at the top tier on the strength of Eggeling's philological training within that landmark academic series, notwithstanding its Victorian age and prose. NotesScholarly translation of the Satapatha Brahmana, 1882.
Citation
Authortranslated by Julius Eggeling
PublisherClarendon Press, Oxford
Eggeling's translation, Sacred Books of the East series, 1882 to 1900. Publication Year1882
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)
This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Rituals, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.