Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Sino-Tibetan Languages

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Sino-Tibetan Languages, edited by Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla, published by Routledge in 2003, is an edited scholarly reference surveying the Sino-Tibetan language family, which includes Chinese, Tibetan, Burmese and hundreds of smaller languages across East and Southeast Asia, with individual chapters contributed by specialists in particular branches and languages of the family. Its strength is that specialist, per language authorship across a family too vast and internally diverse for any single scholar to treat with equal authority, drawing together linguists who work directly on each branch. Its limit is that Sino-Tibetan's own internal classification remains a genuinely disputed question among historical linguists, contributors to the same volume do not all agree on how the family's branches relate to one another, so a claim about the family's overall structure should be attributed to a specific contributor's position rather than presented as the volume's single settled conclusion.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Sino-Tibetan Languages, edited by Graham Thurgood and Randy LaPolla and published by Routledge in 2003, is a peer reviewed edited reference with chapters contributed by specialists in each branch of the family, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Edited scholarly volume on the Sino-Tibetan language family.
Citation
Author
Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.)
Publisher
Routledge
Publication Year
2003
Source Type
Book (scholarly)
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "languages across East and Southeast Asia, with individual chapters contributed by specialists in particular branches and languages of the family."

Source The Sino-Tibetan LanguagesGraham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.)
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Language Families, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Languages, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.