Sources
The Sutta-Nipata
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
This is V. Fausboll's translation of the Sutta-Nipata, an early collection of Buddhist verse discourses, published as volume ten of the Sacred Books of the East series under Max Muller's general editorship and now hosted on the Internet Sacred Text Archive. As a primary Buddhist scripture in a translation produced by a recognized nineteenth century Pali scholar for an academically edited series, it is an appropriate source for the text's own content and its early transmission. Its limit is the ordinary one for a nineteenth century translation, later Pali scholarship has refined some readings and the Sacred Books of the East series carries the interpretive assumptions of its own Victorian moment, so a claim resting on a fine point of translation or on current Buddhist studies scholarship benefits from checking a modern critical translation alongside this historic one.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
This is V. Fausboll's translation of the Sutta-Nipata, published as volume ten of the academically edited Sacred Books of the East series under Max Muller's general editorship, the middle tier reflecting a recognized nineteenth century Pali scholar's work for an edited series, notwithstanding that later Pali scholarship has refined some readings and the series carries the interpretive assumptions of its own Victorian moment. NotesSacred Books of the East, volume 10, part II.
Citation
AuthorV. Fausboll (translator)
PublisherClarendon Press / Internet Sacred Text Archive
Publication Year1881
URLhttps://sacred-texts.com/bud/sbe10/
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Prayers, 6 claims: 4 holds, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.