Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Valediction of Moses: A Proto-Biblical Book

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Idan Dershowitz's The Valediction of Moses is a 2021 academic monograph from Mohr Siebeck, a respected European academic press, arguing that the nineteenth century Shapira Strips, long dismissed as Moses Wilhelm Shapira's own forgery, in fact preserve an authentic and much earlier proto biblical text underlying the book of Deuteronomy. Dershowitz supports the argument with philological analysis and with his own archival discovery of a draft transcription of the strips among Shapira's papers, a genuine contribution regardless of how the authenticity question ultimately settles. Its status is a serious, professionally published reassessment rather than either a fringe claim or an accepted new consensus; specialists in biblical philology and manuscript history have responded with real interest and real skepticism in roughly equal measure. Cite it as a documented contemporary scholarly position under live debate, not as having resolved the strips' authenticity.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Idan Dershowitz's The Valediction of Moses, published by the respected European academic press Mohr Siebeck in 2021, the top tier reflecting standard academic peer review and Dershowitz's own archival discovery supporting the argument, notwithstanding that specialists in biblical philology have responded with real skepticism as well as real interest, so it is a documented contemporary scholarly position under live debate rather than a settled finding.
Notes
2021 reassessment arguing the Shapira strips were authentic and preserved a pre-exilic source of Deuteronomy; contested.
Citation
Author
Idan Dershowitz
Publisher
Mohr Siebeck
Publication Year
2021
URL
https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-160644-1
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Moses, Figures

This source names Moses directly: "Idan Dershowitz's The Valediction of Moses is a 2021 academic monograph from Mohr Siebeck, a respected European academic press, arguing that the nineteenth century Shapira Strips, long dismissed as..."

Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 5 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

1

Artifacts & Relics

General References

1

Artifacts & Relics

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.