David Commins's history works from documented historical research into the Wahhabi religious movement's origin and its specific political alliance with the Saudi state, tracing that relationship through named historical stages rather than treating Wahhabism as an undated or purely doctrinal phenomenon. That historical and political grounding, checkable against the specific events and figures it names, is the book's real evidentiary basis. This record has not independently traced further scholarly response to Commins's specific claims since 2006. Use it for established historical facts about Wahhabism's origin, doctrine and political alliance with the Saudi monarchy; a claim conflating Wahhabism generally with the broader modern Salafi movement should be checked, since the two overlap but are not identical, a distinction this study itself maintains.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
David Commins's scholarly history of the Wahhabi religious movement and its relationship to the Saudi state; a critical academic history, so a claim conflating Wahhabism generally with the broader modern Salafi movement should be checked, since the two overlap but are not identical. NotesDavid Commins's scholarly history of the Wahhabi religious movement and its relationship to the Saudi state. Use for established historical facts about Wahhabism's origin, doctrine and political alliance with the Saudi monarchy; a critical academic history, so a claim conflating Wahhabism generally with the broader modern Salafi movement should be checked, since the two overlap but are not identical.
Citation
AuthorDavid Commins
PublisherI.B. Tauris
Publication Year2006
URLhttps://archive.org/details/wahhabimissionsa0000comm_v9y1
Source TypeScholarly work
Connections
Associated With
This source names Wahhabism directly: "historical stages rather than treating Wahhabism as an undated or purely doctrinal phenomenon."
Source The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi ArabiaDavid Commins
Claims Backed By This Source (85 claims)
This source backs 85 claims across the atlas. As facts: 42 well-attested. As cited relationships: 10 holds, 2 connected, 3 critiqued Here, 10 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 17 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Denominations, 26 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 10 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 2 general references.
- Articles, 14 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 connected, 3 general references.
- Doctrines, 14 claims: 2 well-attested, 4 holds, 2 critiqued Here, 6 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Figures, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Organizations, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.