This is Robert Pasnau's Thomas Aquinas entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, published by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University in 2022, a continuously revised, peer reviewed reference entry rather than a fixed-edition monograph, assigned to a subject specialist and checked by a subject editor before publication. Pasnau is a recognized scholar of medieval philosophy. Its strength is that peer editorial process together with the entry's ongoing revision as scholarship on Aquinas develops. Its limit is that an encyclopedia entry compresses a very large secondary literature on Aquinas into a summary, so a claim resting on a specific contested reading of Thomistic metaphysics or natural law theory should be checked against Pasnau's own cited primary and secondary sources rather than treated as the entry's final word.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Robert Pasnau's Thomas Aquinas entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, maintained under the encyclopedia's own editorial board since 2022, is an authored and reviewed reference rather than an independent peer reviewed monograph, hence the middle tier. NotesRobert Pasnau's Thomas Aquinas entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference, not a fixed-edition monograph.
Citation
AuthorRobert Pasnau
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year2022
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas/
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Thomas Aquinas directly: "This is Robert Pasnau's Thomas Aquinas entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, published by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University in 2022, a continuously revised, peer..."
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)
This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Philosophical Schools, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.