Sources
Thomas Becket
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Frank Barlow's Thomas Becket, published by Weidenfeld and Nicolson in London in 1986, is a scholarly biography of the twelfth century Archbishop of Canterbury whose murder in his own cathedral in 1170 made him one of medieval England's most venerated saints. Barlow was a historian of medieval England whose earlier work on the period underlies this biography. Its strength is that it is grounded in the substantial surviving contemporary documentary record of Becket's conflict with Henry II, treated with the critical distance of an academic historian rather than a hagiographer. Its limit is that it is a single, now decades-old biography of a figure whose historical reputation has continued to be reassessed, so a claim resting on Barlow's specific interpretation of Becket's motives or character should be checked against more recent biographical scholarship as well.
Facts
Citation
AuthorFrank Barlow
PublisherWeidenfeld and Nicolson, London
1986 first UK edition; University of California Press issued the same year's US edition. Publication Year1986
Source Typeacademic biography
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Frank Barlow's Thomas Becket, published by Weidenfeld and Nicolson in 1986, is a scholarly biography grounded in the substantial surviving contemporary documentary record, treated at the top tier. NotesFrank Barlow's scholarly biography of Thomas Becket.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Franks directly: "Frank Barlow's Thomas Becket, published by Weidenfeld and Nicolson in London in 1986, is a scholarly biography of the twelfth century Archbishop of Canterbury whose murder in his own cathedral in..."
London, Cities This source names London directly: "by Weidenfeld and Nicolson in London in 1986, is a scholarly biography of the twelfth century Archbishop of Canterbury whose murder in his own cathedral in 1170 made him one of medieval England's..."
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.