Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Tibetan Calendar Mathematics

Svante Janson is a mathematician at Uppsala University, and this paper is his detailed scholarly analysis of the calculations underlying the Tibetan calendar, translating the traditional computational rules into modern mathematical notation. Its strength is that it works directly from the calendar's own astronomical and arithmetic rules rather than from secondhand description, making the actual mechanics of a genuinely complex lunisolar system checkable and explicit. Its limit is that it is a technical mathematical paper aimed at readers wanting the calculation method itself, not an introduction to the calendar's religious significance, so a claim about that religious meaning needs a source focused on that side of the calendar.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Uppsala University as Svante Janson's detailed scholarly mathematical analysis of Tibetan calendar computation, peer reviewed university-level scholarship.
Notes
Scholarly study of the mathematical and astronomical calculations underlying the Tibetan calendar.
Citation
Author
Svante Janson
Publisher
Uppsala University
Publication Year
2014
Source Type
Thesis
Connections

Associated With

Uppsala, Cities

This source names Uppsala directly: "Svante Janson is a mathematician at Uppsala University, and this paper is his detailed scholarly analysis of the calculations underlying the Tibetan calendar, translating the traditional..."

Source Tibetan Calendar MathematicsSvante Janson
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)

This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Calendars, 12 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Holidays & Festivals, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.