Sources
Tomokichi Fukurai
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
This is not a separate work: it is the Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on Tomokichi Fukurai, one article inside the same continuously maintained online reference this atlas also records as a general source. It descends from that encyclopedia rather than standing beside it, so citing this entry alongside the general Psi Encyclopedia record, or alongside another of its articles, is one editorial voice, not corroboration. Its real limit is the encyclopedia's own limit: an advocacy-adjacent field reference rather than a religiously neutral academic body. Use it for what this specific entry states about Fukurai's coining of nensha, or "thoughtography", and his failed experiments with Chizuko Mifune; a claim needing independent scholarly assessment of those experiments needs a source produced outside the Society.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
The Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia entry on Tomokichi Fukurai, the middle tier reflecting its status as an advocacy-adjacent field reference rather than a religiously neutral academic body. It is one article inside the same continuously maintained online reference this atlas also records as a general source, so citing it alongside that general record is one editorial voice, not corroboration. Use it for what this entry states about Fukurai's coining of nensha, or thoughtography, and his failed experiments with Chizuko Mifune; independent scholarly assessment needs a source produced outside the Society. NotesBiographical summary of Fukurai's coining of nensha ('thoughtography') and his failed experiments with Chizuko Mifune.
Citation
AuthorPsi Encyclopedia (Society for Psychical Research)
Source Typereference-database
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
This record's own Author field names the Society for Psychical Research's own Psi Encyclopedia, not an individual named scholar, for its entry on Tomokichi Fukurai; one article inside that same continuously maintained project, not a witness independent of it.
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)
This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected.
- Psi Phenomena, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.