Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Transitus Fluvii (reference article)

This is a Wikipedia reference article rather than independent scholarship, cited narrowly for checkable specifics documented in its own sources: the pre-Agrippa print appearances of this alphabet in the works of de Balmes in 1523, Tory in 1529 and Panteo in 1530, the river crossing explanation given for its name, and Panteo's own ascription of the alphabet to Abraham. This record holds it at the tier appropriate to a collaboratively edited general encyclopedia rather than to specialist scholarship. Use it for these specific points about Transitus Fluvii's early print history and traditional ascription; a claim needing closer manuscript comparison across these three early printings needs a dedicated scholarly source on Renaissance Hebrew and occult alphabets, which this general reference article does not provide. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
A Wikipedia reference article cited narrowly for the pre-Agrippa print appearances (de Balmes 1523, Tory 1529, Panteo 1530), the river-crossing name explanation and Panteo's own ascription to Abraham. The tier-3 use, not specialist scholarship on Renaissance Hebrew alphabets.
Notes
Used for the pre-Agrippa printings by de Balmes (1523), Tory (1529) and Panteo (1530), the river-crossing explanation of the name, and Panteo's ascription of the alphabet to Abraham.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitus_Fluvii
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

Abraham, Figures

This source names Abraham directly: "own ascription of the alphabet to Abraham."

Source Transitus Fluvii (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (77 claims)

This source backs 77 claims across the atlas. As facts: 51 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 23 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Alphabet Letters, 66 claims: 44 well-attested, 22 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Scripts & Magical Alphabets, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.