Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

United States v. An Article or Device, "Hubbard Electrometer", 333 F. Supp. 357 (D.D.C. 1971)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

United States v. An Article or Device, Hubbard Electrometer, decided by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in 1971, is the court's own written opinion, by Judge Gerhard Gesell, on a Food and Drug Administration seizure of Scientology E-meters and related literature. As the primary judicial record itself, it is fully authoritative for what the court actually ruled, which is the fact this atlas cites it for. It is a legal ruling on a regulatory question, not an independent study of Scientology's beliefs or practices generally.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
United States v. An Article or Device, Hubbard Electrometer, decided by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in 1971, the top tier reflecting that it is the court's own written opinion, the primary judicial record itself, fully authoritative for what the court actually ruled, notwithstanding that it is a legal ruling on a regulatory question rather than an independent study of Scientology's beliefs generally.
Notes
Decided 30 July 1971 by Judge Gerhard Gesell, on a Food and Drug Administration seizure of E-meters and literature.
Citation
Author
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Publisher
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Publication Year
1971
URL
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/333/357/1606969/
Source Type
Case law
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 critiqued Here. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • New Religious Movements, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Critiqued Here

1

New Religious Movements

General References

2

Historical Figures

New Religious Movements

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.