Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Sikh Woodcut of the Tughlaq Ruler Visiting Namdev, accession IM.2:146-1917 (Victoria and Albert Museum)

Victoria and Albert Museum collections API record, read 2026-08-18

The Victoria and Albert Museum's own collections API record for a Sikh woodcut, catalogued with the sentence "Sikh woodcut depicting the Tughlaq ruler of Hindustan visiting Namdev," made in Lahore or Amritsar around 1870. Accession number IM.2:146-1917.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own collections API record for the accessioned woodcut, the strongest available record for its subject, place and date, whose own cataloguing sentence names the subject outright.
Citation
Publisher
Victoria and Albert Museum
URL
https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O79116
Source Type
Museum
Connections

Associated With

Amritsar, Cities

This source names Amritsar directly: "visiting Namdev," made in Lahore or Amritsar around 1870."

Source Sikh Woodcut of the Tughlaq Ruler Visiting Namdev, accession IM.2:146-1917 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Lahore, Cities

This source names Lahore directly: "of Hindustan visiting Namdev," made in Lahore or Amritsar around 1870."

Source Sikh Woodcut of the Tughlaq Ruler Visiting Namdev, accession IM.2:146-1917 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Namdev, Figures

This source names Namdev directly: "Tughlaq ruler of Hindustan visiting Namdev," made in Lahore or Amritsar around 1870."

Source Sikh Woodcut of the Tughlaq Ruler Visiting Namdev, accession IM.2:146-1917 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 11 claims: 4 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.