Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Rama and Lakshmana, museum number IS.32-1959 (Victoria and Albert Museum)

Victoria and Albert Museum collections record, read 2026-08-18

The Victoria and Albert Museum's own collections record for "Rama and Lakshmana," a Kalighat watercolour and tin alloy painting on paper, ca. 1890, from Kolkata, showing the two brothers fighting the demon Viravahu, with a handwritten Bengali inscription naming the battle. South and South East Asia Collection, museum number IS.32-1959.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own collections record for the accessioned object, the strongest available record for its date, materials and museum number, its own title and description naming Lakshmana directly alongside Rama.
Citation
Publisher
Victoria and Albert Museum
URL
https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O432378
Source Type
Museum
Connections

Associated With

Bengali, Languages

This source names Bengali directly: "the demon Viravahu, with a handwritten Bengali inscription naming the battle."

Source Rama and Lakshmana, museum number IS.32-1959 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Kolkata, Cities

This source names Kolkata directly: "1890, from Kolkata, showing the two brothers fighting the demon Viravahu, with a handwritten Bengali inscription naming the battle."

Source Rama and Lakshmana, museum number IS.32-1959 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Lakshmana, Figures

This source names Lakshmana directly: "own collections record for "Rama and Lakshmana," a Kalighat watercolour and tin alloy painting on paper, ca."

Source Rama and Lakshmana, museum number IS.32-1959 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.