Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Vyasa, accession IS.360-1961 (Victoria and Albert Museum)

Victoria and Albert Museum collection API record, read 2026-08-18

The Victoria and Albert Museum's own collection API record for "Vyasa," a Kalighat-style painting in watercolour and tin alloy on cardboard, Kolkata, ca. 1890. The record's own physical description reads "the sage Vyasa with attendants," its structured content-person tagging names Vyasa directly, and the painting's own Bengali inscription is transliterated by the museum as "byas muni," accession number IS.360-1961.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own collection API record for the accessioned object, the strongest available record for its Kalighat provenance and accession number, its own content-person tagging and translated Bengali inscription both naming Vyasa directly.
Citation
Publisher
Victoria and Albert Museum
URL
https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O432495/
Source Type
Museum
Connections

Associated With

Bengali, Languages

This source names Bengali directly: "Vyasa directly, and the painting's own Bengali inscription is transliterated by the museum as "byas muni," accession number IS.360-1961."

Source Vyasa, accession IS.360-1961 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Kolkata, Cities

This source names Kolkata directly: "and tin alloy on cardboard, Kolkata, ca."

Source Vyasa, accession IS.360-1961 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Vyasa, Figures

This source names Vyasa directly: "own collection API record for "Vyasa," a Kalighat-style painting in watercolour and tin alloy on cardboard, Kolkata, ca."

Source Vyasa, accession IS.360-1961 (Victoria and Albert Museum)
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 6 well-attested. As cited relationships: 7 holds.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 4 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.