Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2

Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2, led by Michael J. Orlich, Pramil N. Singh, Joan Sabate, Gary E. Fraser and colleagues and published in JAMA Internal Medicine in 2013, presents the principal mortality result from the large, ongoing prospective cohort study of Seventh-day Adventists in North America, finding lower all-cause mortality among vegetarian dietary patterns compared with non-vegetarian ones within the cohort. Its strength is a large sample size and rigorous peer reviewed epidemiological design within a population whose religiously motivated dietary practice makes it an unusually good natural cohort for studying diet's health effects. Its limit is that it is an observational cohort study, not a randomized trial, so it can show association rather than prove that diet alone caused the mortality difference; other lifestyle factors correlated with Adventist practice could contribute, a limitation the study's own authors discuss.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2, led by Michael Orlich and colleagues and published in JAMA Internal Medicine in 2013, is a large, rigorous peer reviewed epidemiological cohort study, treated at the top tier notwithstanding its observational rather than randomized design.
Notes
Principal mortality result from the second Adventist cohort.
Citation
Author
Michael J. Orlich, Pramil N. Singh, Joan Sabate, Gary E. Fraser and colleagues
Publisher
JAMA Internal Medicine
Publication Year
2013
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Connections

Associated With

Americas, Continents

This source names Americas directly: "Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2, led by Michael J."

Source Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2Michael J. Orlich, Pramil N. Singh, Joan Sabate, Gary E. Fraser and colleagues
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)

This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Studies, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Secular Organizations, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Years, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.