Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Visions of Zion: Ethiopians and Rastafari in the Search for the Promised Land

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Visions of Zion, by the media scholar Erin C. MacLeod, is the first sustained study of how Ethiopians themselves perceive the Rastafari community settled at Shashamane on land Haile Selassie I granted in 1948. Drawing on more than ninety interviews conducted primarily at Shashamane, MacLeod centers the host society's perspective rather than repeating the settlers' own well documented account of repatriation, tracing how Ethiopian law and Ethiopian neighbors have received an immigrant community that understands itself as returning members of the Ethiopian diaspora. Its authority rests on extensive original interview fieldwork and New York University Press's standard scholarly peer review. Its limit is that its interview base, drawn primarily from Shashamane itself, speaks most directly to that one settlement rather than to Rastafari repatriation or Ethiopian public opinion nationwide.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Erin C. MacLeod's Visions of Zion, published by New York University Press in 2014, is a peer reviewed monograph, the first sustained study of how Ethiopians themselves perceive Rastafari, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Study of Ethiopian perceptions of the Rastafari repatriation community at Shashamane, based on more than ninety interviews conducted primarily in Shashamane, examining the legal and social standing of settlers on the 1948 Haile Selassie land grant.
Citation
Author
Erin C. MacLeod
Publisher
New York University Press
Publication Year
2014
URL
https://nyupress.org/9781479882243/visions-of-zion/
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Haile Selassie I directly: "settled at Shashamane on land Haile Selassie I granted in 1948."

New York, Cities

This source names New York directly: "Its authority rests on extensive original interview fieldwork and New York University Press's standard scholarly peer review."

Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Sites, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.