Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Waldensian Evangelical Church (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia, English article, read 2026-08-16

The English Wikipedia article on the Waldensian Evangelical Church, community edited, carrying the church's own 1967 figure of 30,000 members in Italy plus 15,000 affiliates in Argentina and Uruguay. Used here for that historical figure. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldensian_Evangelical_Church
Source Type
encyclopedia
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Reliability tier 3: a community-edited encyclopedia article, used here for its 1967 figure of 30,000 members in Italy and 15,000 affiliates in Argentina and Uruguay, which the article carries from the church's own website rather than independent research.
Connections

Associated With

Argentina, Countries

This source names Argentina directly: "in Italy plus 15,000 affiliates in Argentina and Uruguay."

Source Waldensian Evangelical Church (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors

This source names Waldensian Evangelical Church directly: "The English Wikipedia article on the Waldensian Evangelical Church, community edited, carrying the church's own 1967 figure of 30,000 members in Italy plus 15,000 affiliates in Argentina and Uruguay."

Source Waldensian Evangelical Church (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)

This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Denominations, 14 claims: 13 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.