Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

37 (number) (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia contributors, 2026

Wikipedia's article on the number 37, consulted in 2026, is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication. It is reliable for the kind of standard mathematical classification cited here, that 37 is the twelfth prime and forms no twin prime pair, and for confirming that no religious or scriptural significance is recorded for the number, which is a claim about the absence of documented tradition rather than a specialist mathematical finding. Use it for that narrow purpose; a claim about the number's cultural or religious significance in a specific tradition needs that tradition's own primary or scholarly source. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Tier 3 because this is a community edited Wikipedia article rather than a peer reviewed or specialist mathematical publication. Reliable for the number's standard, checkable mathematical classification cited here and for confirming the absence of recorded religious or scriptural significance, not for interpretive claims about a specific tradition.
Notes
Consulted 2026-08-14 for 37's prime classification (twelfth prime, no twin prime pair) and to confirm no religious or scriptural significance is recorded for the number.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/37_(number)
Source Type
reference article
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Numbers, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Well-attested

9

Numbers

General References

1

Numbers

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.