Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Wikipedia, "Devil's Playground (2002 film)"

Wikipedia

The crowd sourced encyclopedia's article on the documentary, read directly for this entry. Its strength is a clear account of the film's production, its named teenage subjects, its Sundance premiere and festival record, and its plain explanation of rumspringa and of Amish baptism and shunning. It is cited here for the film's own production and reception facts, not as an authority on Amish belief and practice generally, which the atlas's own Amish entity carries separately. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's community maintained article on the documentary is a continuously revised tertiary encyclopedia entry with no named author or peer review process, hence the lower tier, though useful here for the film's production and festival record.
Notes
Read directly. Cited for the January 2002 Sundance premiere, director Lucy Walker, the 77 minute runtime, filming in LaGrange County, Indiana, the five named teenage subjects, the plain definition of rumspringa, and the film's treatment of adult baptism and shunning of members who leave the church after being baptized.
Citation
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil's_Playground_(2002_film)
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

Amish, Denominations

This source names Amish directly: "plain explanation of rumspringa and of Amish baptism and shunning."

Source Wikipedia, "Devil's Playground (2002 film)"
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)

This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Screen Works, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.