Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Switch Atlas

Source

Wikipedia, "Hummingbird (Seals & Crofts Song)"

The crowd sourced encyclopedia's article on the song, read directly for this entry. Its strength is a well referenced summary of release date, chart performance across the Billboard Hot 100, Cash Box, Billboard Adult Contemporary and the Canadian RPM chart, songwriting and production credits, and the song's own stated subject, a metaphor for Baha'u'llah drawn from Baha'i scripture. Its limit is that it is not independently peer reviewed, so it is cited here for corroborated chart and production detail rather than for interpretation. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Tier three: a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, matching this atlas's established convention for a Wikipedia citation, offering a well referenced summary of the song's chart performance and credits. Cited here for corroborated chart and production detail rather than interpretation.
Notes
Read directly during research; cited for release date, songwriters, producer, label, chart positions and the song's stated Baha'i subject.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hummingbird_(Seals_%26_Crofts_song)
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

Baha'u'llah, Figures

This source names Baha'u'llah directly: "The crowd sourced encyclopedia's article on the song, read directly for this entry."

Source Wikipedia, "Hummingbird (Seals & Crofts Song)"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Musical Works, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.