Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Perpetua and Felicity (Wikipedia)

source

A Wikipedia article on Perpetua and Felicity, Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua, Felicitas, Revocatus, Saturninus and Saturus from the Menologion of Basil II (c. AD 1000)," an early Byzantine illuminated service book. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Tier three: a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, matching this atlas's established convention for a Wikipedia citation. The source that names Perpetua, Felicity and the illumination's manuscript together; corroborated on the object's date, holding library and illuminators by the Wikimedia Commons file record, which gives the fifth martyr's name differently.
Citation
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetua_and_Felicity
Source Type
encyclopedia
Connections

Associated With

Carthage, Cities

This source names Carthage directly: "Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua, Felicitas, Revocatus, Saturninus and Saturus from..."

Source Perpetua and Felicity (Wikipedia)

This source names Felicity directly: "A Wikipedia article on Perpetua and Felicity, Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua..."

Source Perpetua and Felicity (Wikipedia)

This source names Perpetua directly: "A Wikipedia article on Perpetua and Felicity, Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua..."

Source Perpetua and Felicity (Wikipedia)
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.