The crowd sourced encyclopedia's article on the artist, read directly for this entry. Its strength is a well referenced summary of his biography, his founding of the Ravi Varma Fine Art Lithographic Press in 1894, and the press's role in standardizing and mass distributing Hindu devotional imagery as what became known as "calendar art." Its limit is that it does not itself fix a firm date for the Saraswati painting specifically, which is why that fact is recorded here as unknown rather than sourced to this article. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
A continuously revised, community-edited encyclopedia article rather than an authored or peer reviewed work, matching this corpus's settled precedent for Wikipedia citations, useful for verifiable factual detail rather than as independent scholarly authority. NotesRead directly during research; cited for Ravi Varma's biography and the Ravi Varma Press's founding and cultural impact.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raja_Ravi_Varma
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
This source names Saraswati directly: "not itself fix a firm date for the Saraswati painting specifically, which is why that fact is recorded here as unknown rather than sourced to this article."
Source Wikipedia, "Raja Ravi Varma"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (41 claims)
This source backs 41 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 6 holds, 1 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 19 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 5 holds, 2 general references.
- Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Groups, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.