Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

William S. Sadler (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's biographical article on William S. Sadler, covering his medical training under John Harvey Kellogg, his brief study under Sigmund Freud in 1910, his psychiatric practice in Chicago, and his role in the origin and publication of The Urantia Book. Useful for the biographical spine; not a source for the book's own claims of celestial authorship. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Sadler
Source Type
encyclopedia
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's biographical article on William S. Sadler is a continuously revised tertiary encyclopedia entry with no named author or peer review process, hence the lower tier, though useful for the biographical spine.
Notes
Community edited encyclopedia article, checked directly. Fit for the biographical spine; not fit for evaluating the Urantia Book's own cosmological claims.
Connections

Associated With

Chicago, Cities

This source names Chicago directly: "in 1910, his psychiatric practice in Chicago, and his role in the origin and publication of The Urantia Book."

Source William S. Sadler (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (40 claims)

This source backs 40 claims across the atlas. As facts: 30 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 2 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 16 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 15 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 connected, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.