Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Wudang Quan (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on Wudang quan, the internal martial arts associated with the Wudang Mountains, consulted 2026-08-11. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's article on Wudang quan, the internal martial arts associated with the Wudang Mountains, consulted 2026-08-11, the lower tier reflecting a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, useful for a general overview of the tradition.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on Wudang quan, consulted 2026-08-11. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; used here for Huang Zongxi's 1669 documentation of the internal and external classification, the article's own statement that historians found no historical link between the Zhang Sanfeng legend and Wudang, named later lineage holders, and the 1994 UNESCO designation, standard reference facts including the article's own correction of the popular legend.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wudang_quan
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

Wudang Quan (Wikipedia) names Wudang Mountains by its exact full name: ternal martial arts associated with the Wudang Mountains, consulted 2026-08-11.

Source Wudang Quan (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Practices, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.

Well-attested

14

General References

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.