Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Emperor Wuzong's Edict on the Suppression of Buddhism (Asia for Educators, Columbia University)

Asia for Educators, Columbia University

Columbia University's Asia for Educators program, run by the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, preserves and translates Emperor Wuzong's own edict on the suppression of Buddhism from the eighth month of 845, the primary document in which the emperor names Buddhism a foreign teaching harmful to the state while elevating the native teaching of the Yellow Emperor and Laozi, used here as the primary institutional record of Taoism's formal elevation at Buddhism's expense.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A university hosted translation of the primary edict itself, tier 1, matching the tier the map gives comparable institutionally hosted primary source translations, used here for the edict's own language and reasoning, corroborated by Stanley Weinstein's academic history of Buddhism under the Tang dynasty.
Notes
Used for the edict's own text and reasoning, dated to the eighth month of 845.
Citation
Author
Emperor Wuzong of Tang
Publisher
Asia for Educators, Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University
URL
https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/ps/cup/emperor_wuzong_suppress_buddhism.pdf
Source Type
Primary text in translation
Connections

Associated With

Laozi, Figures

This source names Laozi directly: "teaching of the Yellow Emperor and Laozi, used here as the primary institutional record of Taoism's formal elevation at Buddhism's expense."

Source Emperor Wuzong's Edict on the Suppression of Buddhism (Asia for Educators, Columbia University)Emperor Wuzong of Tang
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Spread Events, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.