Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Spread Events

The Supreme Court Strikes Down Hialeah's Ban On Santeria

Santeria

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1987

After a Santeria congregation, the Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, announced plans to open in Hialeah, Florida, the city council passed ordinances in September 1987 banning ritual animal sacrifice while exempting kosher slaughter, ordinary slaughterhouses, hunting and pest control. The congregation sued, and on 11 June 1993 the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the ordinances violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment because they targeted religious conduct specifically. The ruling gave Santeria practitioners the same legal footing in the United States that other religions already held, protecting a central practice of the tradition from a law written to reach it alone.

Facts
Dates
Start Year
from 1987 1
Sourced to the subject's own account1987 is when Hialeah passed the ordinances the case challenged; the Supreme Court did not rule until 1993, six years later.
End YearSourced to the subject's own account
to 1993 1
StatusSourced to the subject's own account
Established 1
Learn More
How the Supreme Court Struck Down Hialeah's Ban on Santeria

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

After a Santeria congregation, the Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, announced plans to open in Hialeah, Florida, the city council passed ordinances in September 1987 banning ritual animal sacrifice while carving out exemptions for kosher slaughter, ordinary slaughterhouses, hunting and pest control. The congregation read the exemptions as proof the ban targeted its religion specifically, and sued.

The case reached the United States Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously on June 11, 1993, six years after Hialeah passed the ordinances. The Court held that the ordinances violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment precisely because they singled out religious conduct rather than applying a neutral rule of general application.

The exemptions written into the ordinances were what sank them: a law that exempted every comparable killing of animals except the religious one could not credibly claim to be about anything other than the religion itself.

What the ruling changed for Santeria's standing in the United States was parity with every other religion practiced there. A tradition that had been legislated against by name, however indirectly, won the same constitutional protection for its central practices that other faiths already took for granted, closing off a legal strategy other municipalities might otherwise have copied.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Occurred In

Spread Event Of

Santeria's first legal-recognition event in the United States, distinct from the 1959 exile that first brought the tradition there.

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.