Subcategories
Modern Satanism
4 of 208 entries in Denominations. Click any to see everything it connects to.
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin From 1966: organised Satanism dates from the founding of the Church of Satan in San Francisco. What was called satanism before that is very largely a construction of its accusers rather than a movement that existed.
The organised movements that have taken Satan as their central symbol or figure since the mid twentieth century. They divide sharply over whether Satan is a real being or a deliberate symbol of self-determination and opposition to imposed authority; several are explicitly atheistic. The entries set out what each organisation actually holds, which is generally not what it is popularly assumed to hold.
Facts
Overview
What Defines This GroupingOrganised movements that have taken Satan as their central symbol or figure since the mid twentieth century. They divide sharply over whether Satan is a real being or a deliberate symbol of self-determination and of opposition to imposed authority; several are explicitly atheistic. 2 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThe satanic panic of the 1980s and 1990s attributed organised ritual crime to these movements. The allegations were investigated and not substantiated, and the episode is now studied as a moral panic. 2 Status
Status TodayLiving: these are current organisations with stated doctrine, public membership and a documented history, and are described here in the present tense. 2 Origins
Origin PeriodFrom 1966: organised Satanism dates from the founding of the Church of Satan in San Francisco. What was called satanism before that is very largely a construction of its accusers rather than a movement that existed. 2 Learn More
The currents of modern Satanism
This group holds the organised currents of modern Satanism, a set of new religious and philosophical movements of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. These are diverse and often mutually critical, and most are best understood not as devil-worship but as movements that adopt Satan as a symbol of self-determination or opposition.
The browser will find atheistic and symbolic forms, which treat Satan as an emblem of individualism rather than a literal being, alongside theistic currents. The atlas describes each group's stated philosophy and origin, distinguishing them from the imagined satanism of moral panics.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.