Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Textual Witnesses

Codex Vaticanus

Codices

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The other of the two oldest substantially complete Greek Bibles, and for many textual critics the single most important New Testament manuscript. It is written in three columns of a plain, small majuscule on unusually fine parchment, without ornament, by scribes working to a standard that suggests a well-funded scriptorium. Its text is the anchor of what scholars call the Alexandrian type, and modern critical editions of the Greek New Testament follow it more often than any other witness. It has been in the Vatican Library since at least 1475 and nothing is known of where it was before then. Its ending is lost, so it cannot say whether it once contained Revelation.

Facts
Dating
Date Attributed
Dated by scholars to the fourth century CE, among the oldest surviving complete manuscripts of the Greek Bible. 2
Identity
Script Type
Greek biblical majuscule, three columns to the page, later traced over by a corrector 1
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Alexandrian text-type, and its principal witness 2
Structure
Structure
Old and New Testaments, breaking off at Hebrews 9:14 1
Custody
Current Location
Held by the Vatican Apostolic Library, from which it takes its name. 1
Learn More
A Plain Book, and the Corrector Who Went Over It

Vaticanus is not a beautiful manuscript in the way the illuminated gospel books are beautiful. It is three columns of small, even Greek majuscule on parchment so fine it is often remarked on, with no illustration, no gold, and almost no decoration of any kind. The impression it gives is of a scriptorium that had money and used it on materials and accuracy rather than on display. For textual critics that plainness is the point: the book was made to be a reliable copy.

Centuries after it was written the ink had faded, and a later scribe went through the entire manuscript tracing over every letter. Where he judged a word to be wrong he left it untouched, and those skipped words are now among the most valuable things in the book, because they show the original hand exactly as it was, unretouched, beside the retouched text around them. A correction made by omission has preserved the evidence of what was corrected.

The codex is substantially complete but with real gaps. The beginning of Genesis is missing, part of the Psalms, and everything after Hebrews 9:14, which removes the Pastoral Epistles, Philemon and Revelation. Because the ending is lost, the manuscript cannot be asked whether it once contained Revelation, and that silence has been argued over for as long as the codex has been studied.

In the Library Since 1475, and Unknown Before It

The first securely dated fact about the Codex Vaticanus is that it is listed in the earliest surviving catalogue of the Vatican Library, compiled in 1475. Everything before that is missing. Where it was made, who paid for it, how it came to Rome and by what route are all open, and the manuscript volunteers nothing: it has no colophon, no ownership note from antiquity, no dated marginal hand that fixes it anywhere. For a book this important that blank is conspicuous, and it is honest to call it a blank rather than to fill it with the likeliest guess.

Its modern history is better recorded and less creditable. Napoleon had the codex taken to Paris in 1809 and it came back in 1815. Through most of the nineteenth century the library allowed scholars only short, supervised sittings with it, which produced a long and bitter argument about whether the text was being withheld; Tischendorf, permitted to look but not to transcribe at length, copied more than he had been allowed and was expelled in 1866. A photographic facsimile was finally issued in 1889 and 1890, and the whole manuscript is now digitised and open.

The result is a book that shaped every modern critical edition of the Greek New Testament while its own first thousand years remain entirely unknown.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Held Differently

Eastern Orthodoxy, Denominations

The received New Testament of the Orthodox churches is the Byzantine text, printed as the Patriarchal Text of 1904, so this codex is honoured as an ancient witness without being the text the Church reads.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Greek Orthodox Church, Denominations

The Greek-speaking churches read the Byzantine text of 1904 rather than the Alexandrian text this codex carries, so its authority for them is historical rather than liturgical.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Element Of

The codex has been in the Vatican Library since at least its catalogue of 1475 and is among the manuscripts the modern Roman critical editions of the New Testament rest on.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Housed At

The Codex Vaticanus has been in the library since at least 1475, when it appears in the first surviving catalogue, and nothing certain is known of it before that.

Sources
1. DigiVatLib, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Codex Vaticanus (Vat.gr.1209)
Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana
2. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 4th edition
Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman, Oxford University Press, 2005
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.