Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Tzolkin Day Signs

Imix

EE-meesh
Also Known As Imox (K'iche' Maya) The K'iche' (highland Guatemalan) name for this day, already named in this entry's Description in a simplified spelling without the glottal stop; this alias restores standard K'iche' orthography. Source: Barbara Tedlock, Time and the Highland Maya.

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 250 to 900 CE

Imix is the first of the twenty day signs of the Tzolkin, the 260-day Maya sacred calendar formed by pairing twenty named days with thirteen numbers. Imix (the Yucatec name; called Imox in the K iche highlands) is the waterlily and the primordial crocodile or earth-monster whose back is the world, an image of the deep primal waters from which creation arises. It is associated with the east and the color red, the direction of dawn and beginnings. Its themes are the source, the womb of being, nurture, and the raw, undifferentiated potential that precedes all form. To be born under Imix is read as being close to the origin: deeply nurturing and receptive but also prone to being overwhelmed by primal emotion and the flood of the unconscious.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
250 to 900 CE 1Tradition: Classic Maya inscriptions
Origin Period
600 BCE to 250 CE 1Tradition: Preclassic Mesoamerican inscriptions
Origin Period
Imix is one of the twenty day signs of the tzolkin, the two hundred and sixty day count whose structure is traced to Middle Preclassic origins by around the sixth century BCE, with the day signs' own attestation concentrated in the Classic Maya monumental record between the third and tenth centuries CE. 1
Place of Origin
Mesoamerica. Among the Maya, the lowlands of the Yucatan peninsula, Guatemala, Belize and Chiapas, and the Guatemalan highlands. 1
Origin of the Name
In the living Kiche count the same day is Imox. Yucatec and Kiche name the twenty days differently, and the two lists are not interchangeable. 2Tradition: Highland Maya daykeeping in Guatemala
Origin of the Name
The name recorded here, Imix, is the colonial Yucatec form set down after the conquest. It is not the Classic reading and it is not the name used by the daykeepers who keep the count today. 3Tradition: Colonial Yucatec Maya sources (the Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan and the Books of Chilam Balam)
Language
Kiche Maya 2
Language
Maya hieroglyphic 1
Language
Yucatec Maya 3
Attributions
Direction
East 1
Associated Color
Red 1
Meaning
Literal Meaning
Waterlily / Crocodile 1
Themes
Primal waters, nurture, origin 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Daykeepers read Imox as the primordial waters and what is unbounded or unrestrained. 2Tradition: Highland Maya daykeeping in Guatemala
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The day glyph is read as the waterlily, and with it the crocodilian earth on which the world rests. 1Tradition: Classic Maya inscriptions
Identity
Position
1 of 20 1
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A standard analytic category in the study of religion 1
Status Today
Living tradition, practised today 2
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
The Dreamspell of Jose Arguelles renames this day Red Dragon and fixes it to the Gregorian calendar. Because that scheme sets 29 February outside the count, the day it returns drifts from the day the Guatemalan daykeepers give, and the two counts cannot be reconciled. 4
Learn More
Imix, the First Day Sign

Imix is the first of the twenty day signs of the Tzolk'in, the 260-day sacred count of the Maya. The count interlocks twenty named day signs with thirteen numbers, and it is not an artifact of the past: it is still kept today by K'iche', Ixil, Mam, and other Maya daykeepers, the ajq'ij of highland Guatemala, alongside the reconstructed Classic-period system known from the inscriptions. This day sign is recorded here by its colonial Yucatec name, Imix; the living K'iche' tradition knows the corresponding day as Imox. Its imagery is the waterlily and the crocodile, the primal waters and the earth that floats upon them, a sign of origin, nurture, and the source. In the directional scheme that runs through the twenty signs it belongs to the east and the colour red, the place of sunrise and beginnings. These are the meanings the tradition carries.

Imix opens not only the twenty-sign cycle recorded here in its colonial Yucatec ordering but, independently, a different conventional starting point in the living K'iche' daykeeping tradition, where the count is customarily described beginning from B'atz', the eleventh sign in the Yucatec ordering used throughout this atlas, reflecting the fact that the Tzolk'in's 260-day cycle has no single privileged starting point built into its own arithmetic; any position can serve as a count's beginning, and different communities and different colonial-era sources fixed their own conventional first day for descriptive purposes. Imix's directional and colour placement, east and red, is nonetheless a fixed structural feature independent of which day a given tradition treats as first, since it follows from Imix's position, one, within the twenty-sign sequence rather than from any claim about where the count itself begins.

Imix Across Mesoamerica

The sign written Imix in the colonial Yucatec sources is Imox to the ajq'ijab', the daykeepers of the K'iche' highlands who still run the count today, and the Classic-period inscriptions carry it as the first of the twenty with a glyph of its own rather than any later spelling. Reading the three together is the ordinary condition of Maya calendar study: one sequence, several languages, and a long documentary gap between the carved record and the living practice that survived it.

The 260-day count reached well beyond the Maya area. In central Mexico the same arithmetic of twenty signs against thirteen numbers ran as the tonalpohualli, and the sign standing first there is Cipactli, the crocodile or earth caiman, the same primal reptile afloat in the first waters that Imix carries. Correspondences of this kind hold along the whole list, which is the strongest single reason to think the count older than any one of the peoples who kept it.

Within the count, each of the twenty signs opens a trecena, a run of thirteen consecutively numbered days, exactly once in every 260-day round, so a trecena beginning 1 Imix exists and colours the twelve days after it. Imix is not among the four signs able to carry a year. In the Classic system those are Ik, Manik, Eb and Kaban; in the Postclassic Yucatec system Diego de Landa recorded they are Kan, Muluc, Ix and Kawak.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Contained In

Tzolkin, Calendars

One of the twenty day signs the count runs against the thirteen numbers.

Derived from This

Why this is disputed. Jose Arguelles built the Dreamspell system in the 1980s, presenting his 260 kin count and its 20 named seals, Red Dragon (Solar Seal 1) among them, as a rediscovery of the authentic Maya Tzolkin day signs, Imix among them. Maya daykeepers who have kept the traditional 260 day count continuously since before the conquest reject that equivalence, documenting that the Dreamspell count runs on a fixed Gregorian cycle out of step with the living count, and that Arguelles's own name, image and meaning for Red Dragon are his invention rather than a transmission of Imix's traditional meaning.

Sources
1. The Maya (9th edition)
Michael D. Coe and Stephen Houston, Thames and Hudson, 2015ch. on Maya arithmetic, writing and the calendarView the Source
2. Time and the Highland Maya
Barbara Tedlock, University of New Mexico Press (revised edition), 1992K'iche' day Imox (east-red) in living Momostenango daykeeping: the waterlily and crocodile of the primal waters, origin; the 260-day count kept by the ajq'ij.
3. Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: An Introduction
J. Eric S. Thompson, University of Oklahoma Press, 1962Yucatec day sign Imix; the twenty day names and the 20x13 structure of the 260-day count reconstructed from the inscriptions; the sign's direction and colour.View the Source
4. The 2012 Phenomenon: New Age Appropriation of an Ancient Mayan Calendar
Robert K. Sitler, University of California Press (Nova Religio 9:3, pp. 24-38), 2006on New Age appropriation of the Maya calendar and its distance from Maya practice
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.