Wars & Conflicts
Bishops' Wars
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Two short military campaigns, in 1639 and 1640, fought between King Charles I of England and Scotland's Covenanter movement. Charles had ordered the Scottish church to adopt a new prayer book modeled on the English liturgy in 1637, a change many Scots read as a step toward Catholic ritual and a direct assault on Presbyterian church government, and the resulting protest produced the National Covenant, signed at Greyfriars Kirkyard in Edinburgh in February 1638, binding its signers to defend Scotland's reformed religion against the change. The First Bishops' War in 1639 ended without significant fighting: Charles's poorly prepared army faced a well organized Covenanter force under Alexander Leslie and the king accepted the Pacification of Berwick rather than risk battle. The dispute reopened in 1640, and a Covenanter army crossed into England, routing English forces at the Battle of Newburn and occupying Newcastle, which cut off London's coal supply and forced Charles to recall the English Parliament for the first time in eleven years to fund a settlement.
Facts
Consequences
What It SettledThe Covenanters won both campaigns without Charles ever imposing the prayer book. The First Bishops' War ended in the inconclusive Pacification of Berwick in June 1639, and the Second ended after the Covenanter victory at Newburn in August 1640 and the occupation of Newcastle, which by cutting off coal shipments to London gave the Covenanters decisive leverage. Charles was forced to summon the Short Parliament and then the Long Parliament to raise funds, reintroducing an English Parliament he had governed without for eleven years, a step historians treat as opening the road to the civil wars that followed across all three of his kingdoms later in the decade. 1 Religious DimensionThe dispute was over church government and worship from its first cause. Charles's 1637 order that the Church of Scotland adopt a prayer book on the English model was read across Scottish society as an attempt to impose bishops and Anglican-style liturgy, seen by many as containing Catholicizing elements, on a church that had governed itself along Presbyterian, non-episcopal lines since the Reformation. The National Covenant that the crisis produced was explicitly a religious document, binding its signers to defend "the true religion" and reformed worship rather than framed as a political grievance, and Covenanter resistance throughout both wars was organized substantially through parish and presbytery structures rather than through a secular political movement. The wars ended with Charles's religious policy in Scotland defeated outright, though the underlying church government dispute was not finally settled until decades later. 1 Open Questions
Death Toll AssessmentThe First Bishops' War produced no significant battle. The only substantial engagement of either campaign, the Battle of Newburn in August 1640, is recorded as roughly three hundred casualties combined across both sides, but that figure covers killed and wounded together without separating the two, and no historian has isolated a confirmed death count from it or added deaths from disease in the two large armies mustered in 1639 and 1640, which was commonly a larger killer than combat in campaigns of this kind and period.
Fissel's study, the standard academic treatment, documents the campaigns' organization, finance and political consequences in detail but does not attempt a reconciled death count, and no other source consulted separates killed from wounded at Newburn or estimates camp mortality for either muster. The Event
When It Happened Principal PartiesKing Charles I of England and Scotland, commanding English royal forces, against Scotland's Covenanter movement, an alliance of Presbyterian nobles, clergy and burghs organized under the National Covenant and commanded militarily by the professional soldier Alexander Leslie. 1 Status
Official RecognitionNot formally recognized by any body 1 Recognition BasisNo international body existed at the time or has since made a genocide or crimes against humanity determination for either campaign; casualties were low by the standard of the era and neither side treated the other's civilian population as a target. 1 Learn More
The Bishops' Wars and the Covenant Against a New Prayer Book
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
In 1637 King Charles I ordered the Church of Scotland to adopt a new prayer book modeled on the English liturgy, a change many Scots read as a step toward Catholic ritual and a direct assault on Presbyterian church government. The protest it provoked produced the National Covenant, signed at Greyfriars Kirkyard in Edinburgh in February 1638, binding its signers to defend Scotland's reformed religion against the change, and two short military campaigns followed. In the First Bishops' War of 1639, Charles's poorly prepared army faced a well organized Covenanter force under the professional soldier Alexander Leslie, and the king accepted the Pacification of Berwick rather than risk battle.
The dispute reopened in 1640, when a Covenanter army crossed into England, routed English forces at the Battle of Newburn and occupied Newcastle, cutting off London's coal supply. The Covenanters won both campaigns without Charles ever imposing the prayer book, and the loss of Newcastle's coal gave them decisive leverage: Charles was forced to summon the Short Parliament and then the Long Parliament to raise funds, recalling an English Parliament he had governed without for eleven years, a step historians treat as opening the road to the civil wars that engulfed all three of his kingdoms later in the decade.
An Unmeasured Toll and a War Fought Through the Parish
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
No historian has produced a reliable death count for either Bishops' War. The First Bishops' War produced no significant battle at all, and the only substantial engagement of either campaign, the Battle of Newburn in August 1640, is recorded only as roughly three hundred combined casualties across both sides, a figure that mixes killed and wounded without separating them and takes no account of deaths from disease in the two large armies mustered in 1639 and 1640, commonly a larger killer than combat in campaigns of this era. This atlas records the toll as unknown rather than adopt that combined figure as a death count.
The wars were organized through religious institutions from their first cause. The National Covenant was an explicitly religious document, binding its signers to defend "the true religion" and reformed worship rather than framed as a political grievance, and Covenanter resistance throughout both wars was organized substantially through parish and presbytery structures rather than through a secular political movement. The wars ended with Charles's religious policy in Scotland defeated outright, its prayer book never imposed, though the underlying dispute over church government was not finally settled for decades.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The prayer book Charles ordered the Scottish church to adopt was modeled directly on the Church of England's own liturgy, and it was that imposition, rather than any Anglican initiative against Scotland, that triggered the crisis.
Belongs to Tradition
The Covenanter movement that fought both campaigns organized explicitly to defend Presbyterian church government and reformed worship against a prayer book many Scots read as a step toward Catholic ritual. The National Covenant binding its members was itself a religious document, not a political manifesto.
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
What Was the Death Toll of the Bishops' Wars?
The only substantial engagement, the Battle of Newburn, is recorded only as a combined casualty figure of roughly three hundred that does not separate killed from wounded, the First Bishops' War produced no significant battle at all, and no historian has estimated the mortality from disease in the two large armies mustered for the campaigns, which was often the larger cause of death in musters of this period.
What would resolve this A study working from English and Scottish muster rolls, parish burial records and military pay records for 1639 and 1640, of the kind Fissel's archival research draws on for the campaigns' administration, extended specifically to separate combat deaths from wounded at Newburn and to estimate camp mortality across both musters.
Early modern British history; military demographyMark Charles Fissel, The Bishops' Wars: Charles I's Campaigns against Scotland, 1638 to 1640
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.