Younger Futhark Runes
Fé
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1200 to 1300
Rune 1 of the sixteen-rune Younger Futhark, the reduced row used across Viking-age Scandinavia and on the great majority of surviving runestones; sound value f. Both the Norwegian and Icelandic Rune Poems open their sequence on this rune with wealth, though the Icelandic poem develops the image through kennings for gold, fire of the sea and the serpent's path, drawing on the hoard-guarding dragon of Germanic legend.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1200 to 1300 2Tradition: Norwegian Rune Poem Origin Period1400 to 1500 2Tradition: Icelandic Rune Poem Origin Period700 to 1200 CE 1Tradition: Younger Futhark inscriptions in Scandinavia Place of OriginScandinavia, where the reduced sixteen-rune row replaced the Elder Futhark through the eighth century and became the script of the Viking age 1 Place of OriginThe two poems that give the runes their names are Norwegian and Icelandic, so the names come from the western Norse area rather than from Sweden and Denmark, where most surviving runestones stand 3 Origin of the NameOld Norse fe, livestock and by extension wealth or money, continuing Proto-Germanic *fehu. It is the same word that stands behind the Old English rune-name feoh. 2 Attributions
Associated Sound Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThis sixteen-rune row, and not the Elder Futhark, is the base from which Guido von List built the eighteen-character Armanen set in 1902, claiming it from the eighteen spells of the Havamal. The Armanen characters and their readings were taken up in Nazi Germany and remain in far-right use. They are a modern construction and no Armanen reading is attested for this rune. 4 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceWealth; in the Icelandic poem developed through gold kennings tied to the hoard guarding serpent 2 Learn More
Fe Across the Norwegian and Icelandic Poems
Fe opens both surviving medieval commentaries on the Younger Futhark, the Norwegian Rune Poem, preserved in a seventeenth century copy of an manuscript now lost but generally dated on linguistic grounds to around the thirteenth century, and the Icelandic Rune Poem, recorded in fifteenth century manuscripts, two independent compositions that nonetheless open their sixteen stanza sequences on the same rune with broadly the same subject, wealth, before developing it in rather different directions. The Norwegian poem reads wealth through its social danger, a source of discord among kinsmen, a note of caution that recalls the Old English Feoh stanza's own concern with wealth rightly handled, while the Icelandic poem instead builds the image outward through a chain of kennings, gold called the fire of the sea and the serpent's path, drawing on the wider Old Norse legendary association of dragons as hoard guardians, most famously Fafnir in the Volsung cycle, a specifically Norse literary allusion the Old English tradition has no equivalent for.
Bruce Dickins' 1915 edition, the standard early English translation of both poems together, presents this kind of divergence as typical of the two texts' relationship generally, sharing rune names and a broadly similar subject for each stanza while developing the actual content along genuinely separate literary lines centuries apart in composition.
Fe and the Sixteen-Rune Reduction
Fe is the first of the sixteen runes of the Younger Futhark, the reduced row that replaced the Elder Futhark's twenty four signs across Scandinavia beginning around the seventh or eighth century CE, a reduction moving in the opposite direction from the Old English futhorc's own expansion to twenty nine runes over the same general period, even though both developments responded to the same underlying pressure, spoken language changing faster than an inherited writing system could track without some kind of adjustment.
Fe descends directly from Fehu, the Elder Futhark's own opening rune, and keeps both its name and its sound value f essentially unchanged across the reduction, one of the more phonetically stable signs in the whole transition. Michael Barnes' handbook on runes notes that the Younger Futhark existed in two closely related letterform traditions, long branch runes, more common on formal Danish memorial inscriptions, and short twig runes, a simplified variant more common in everyday Norwegian and Swedish use, both sharing the same sixteen names and sounds while differing in the specific shape carved for several of the signs, Fe included. Barnes notes that runestone carvers across the whole Younger Futhark corpus used Fe with unusual frequency, since inscriptions commemorating a person's wealth, generosity or paid for memorial were among the most common reasons a family raised a stone at all.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Attested In
Contained In
One of the sixteen characters of the Younger Futhark.
Derived From
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.