Younger Futhark Runes
Þurs
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1200 to 1300
Rune 3 of the sixteen-rune Younger Futhark, the reduced row used across Viking-age Scandinavia and on the great majority of surviving runestones; sound value th. Both poems read this rune as the giant, a being of torment and misfortune; the Icelandic poem specifically calls the giant torturer of women and dweller of the cliffs, imagery consistent with the giants' place in Norse myth as forces outside human and divine order alike.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1200 to 1300 2Tradition: Norwegian Rune Poem Origin Period1400 to 1500 2Tradition: Icelandic Rune Poem Origin Period700 to 1200 CE 1Tradition: Younger Futhark inscriptions in Scandinavia Place of OriginScandinavia, where the reduced sixteen-rune row replaced the Elder Futhark through the eighth century and became the script of the Viking age 1 Place of OriginThe two poems that give the runes their names are Norwegian and Icelandic, so the names come from the western Norse area rather than from Sweden and Denmark, where most surviving runestones stand 3 Origin of the NameOld Norse thurs, a giant or ogre, one of the beings that stand outside human and divine order alike in Norse myth. The corresponding Old English rune-name is thorn, the plant. That is a substitution of subject rather than a sound change, and it is one of the clearest signs that the two rune-name traditions were maintained separately. 2 Attributions
Associated Sound Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThis sixteen-rune row, and not the Elder Futhark, is the base from which Guido von List built the eighteen-character Armanen set in 1902, claiming it from the eighteen spells of the Havamal. The Armanen characters and their readings were taken up in Nazi Germany and remain in far-right use. They are a modern construction and no Armanen reading is attested for this rune. 4 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe giant, torment and misfortune; the Icelandic poem calls it torturer of women, cliff dweller 2 Learn More
Thurs Across the Norwegian and Icelandic Poems
Thurs is one of the runes where the Norwegian and Icelandic poems agree closely on subject even while developing it in their own separate idioms: both read the rune as the giant, a being of torment and misfortune rather than a neutral or admired figure, the Norwegian poem naming the giant as a cause of anguish to women and a source of the kind of misfortune that leaves few men cheerful, and the Icelandic poem developing the same essential reading further, calling the giant torturer of women and a dweller among the cliffs, imagery that fits the giants' place in the wider Old Norse mythological record as beings belonging to wild, uncultivated land outside the settled human and divine order the gods of Asgard maintain. This continuity of reading across two poems separated by roughly two centuries suggests thurs carried an unusually stable, negative association throughout the Younger Futhark's working life, in contrast to a rune such as Ur, where the two witnesses genuinely part ways.
Dickins' 1915 edition notes that thurs's reading here is broadly consistent with its Elder Futhark cognate Thurisaz and, further, with the Old English Thorn stanza's own move from giant to a merely sharp plant, three related traditions all keeping some trace of hazard attached to the same rune shape even as the specific danger named shifts between them.
Thurs and the Sixteen-Rune Reduction
Thurs is the third of the sixteen Younger Futhark runes, descending from Thurisaz, the Elder Futhark's own third rune, one of the more stable continuities across the sixteen rune reduction, its name, sound value and core association with a supernatural hazard all carried forward largely unchanged even as many of the row's other signs absorbed additional sounds or shifted meaning considerably further.
Barnes' handbook notes Thurs's consonant value th as one of several sounds the sixteen rune row kept clearly distinguished despite its general economy elsewhere, a th sound genuinely load bearing in Old Norse and evidently important enough to preserve its own dedicated sign through the reduction rather than being folded into a neighbouring rune's coverage the way some of the row's vowels and voiced or unvoiced consonant pairs were. The rune's letterform, a simple thorn shaped stroke, is essentially identical across the Elder Futhark, the futhorc and the Younger Futhark, one of the row's most visually stable signs across all three surviving runic traditions. Barnes notes that thurs also carried a documented secondary use in Viking age magical and protective inscriptions, sometimes carved repeatedly as an aggressive or apotropaic mark, a practical application the rune poems themselves do not describe but which surviving inscribed objects independently attest.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Attested In
Contained In
One of the sixteen characters of the Younger Futhark.
Derived From
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.