Alphabet Letters
Devanagari Vocalic Ll ॡ
Devanagari Letters
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin Devanagari forms settle between roughly the seventh and the tenth centuries CE, descending from Brahmi through the Gupta and Nagari hands
Long vocalic l is the tenth letter of the varnamala and the emptiest place in it. Its short partner is already confined to forms of one verbal root, and the long form does not occur in any attested Sanskrit word at all; the grammarians list it because the pattern of short and long that governs every other vowel demands a partner here too. Whitney's grammar notes its absence from the language plainly. The letter is worth keeping in view precisely because of that, since it shows what kind of object the varnamala is: a systematic analysis of what the sound system permits, carried through to its conclusion, rather than an inventory of signs a writer would ever need. The Unicode Standard encodes it, and Devanagari fonts provide it, for the same reason.
Facts
Origins
Origin PeriodDevanagari forms settle between roughly the seventh and the tenth centuries CE, descending from Brahmi through the Gupta and Nagari hands 3Tradition: Indian epigraphy Place of OriginNorthern India 3Tradition: Indian epigraphy Origin of the NameNamed by its own sound. Devanagari letter names are the sound itself, unlike the Greek and Semitic names, which are borrowed words 1Tradition: Sanskrit phonetics of the grammarians Sense of the NameThe long partner of vocalic l, listed to complete the vowel pattern though it occurs in no attested Sanskrit word at all. 2 Attributions
Associated SoundA long vocalic l. The sound does not occur in any attested Sanskrit word; the letter completes the pattern of short and long that governs every other vowel 2Tradition: Sanskrit phonetics of the grammarians Whitney states the absence from the language directly. Recorded as an attested absence rather than left blank, because the empty place is the point of the letter. Identity
Script TypeIndependent vowel letter of a Brahmi-derived abugida, written where a word begins with the vowel; a dependent sign is used where it follows a consonant 1 PositionTenth letter of the varnamala, the long partner of vocalic l 1Tradition: Sanskrit phonetics of the grammarians Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceCounted among the matrika, the fifty little mothers of the letter-garland; the count belongs to the series, not to this letter alone 4Tradition: Hindu Tantra, the garland of letters A property of the fifty-letter series. Individual schools assign further correspondences that differ between traditions and are not adopted here. Learn More
Vocalic Ll: A Place in the Table With Nothing in It
Long vocalic l is the tenth letter of the varnamala and the emptiest place in the whole series. Its short partner is already confined to forms of a single verbal root. The long form does not occur in any attested Sanskrit word at all. It is in the alphabet because the pattern that governs every other vowel requires a long partner for every short one, and the grammarians carried the pattern through to its conclusion rather than stopping where the vocabulary stopped. Whitney's grammar states the position without hedging, noting that the sound is not found in the language.
Recording that plainly is more useful than a description that implies otherwise, and this atlas does not assert a use, a value or a meaning for the letter, because none is attested. What can be said is what the letter is for. The varnamala is a phonetic analysis presented as an ordered table, and a table of that kind is judged partly on whether it is complete: if the system distinguishes vowels by quality and by length, and if a liquid can be a vowel, then the long form of every vocalic liquid has a determinate place whether or not anyone ever pronounced one in a word. The Sanskrit phonetic tradition was systematic in a way that has been recognised since Europeans first encountered it, and this letter is a small monument to that systematicity.
The Letter in Print, in Unicode, and in the Count of Fifty
Because the letter has a place in the canonical order, it has continued to be provided for at every stage of the technology used to write Sanskrit. Devanagari typefaces cut for scholarly printing carried it; so do the digital fonts that replaced them. The Unicode Standard encodes it as a distinct character with its own codepoint, and encodes the matching vowel sign separately, so that a text can represent a form containing it even though no such form is known to occur. That is the correct decision for a character encoding, whose job is to represent the writing system rather than to audit the vocabulary, and it is the same reasoning the grammarians applied.
The letter also matters to the count. The Tantric traditions that treat the alphabet as a garland of matrika generally reckon fifty letters, and reaching fifty requires including all four vocalic liquids alongside the two marks for the nasal and the breath. A count that dropped the letters the language does not use would not come to fifty, so the traditions that build on the number depend on exactly this completeness. Andre Padoux's study of the concept of the word in the Hindu Tantras sets out how the schools arrange and interpret the series, and how much their arrangements differ from one another. This atlas records the letter's membership of the series and leaves each school's further attributions to that school.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
Devanagari Vocalic Ll descends from the Brahmi sign of the same value, through the Gupta and Nagari hands of northern India. The two alphabets align letter for letter because both are laid out in the varnamala order, the arrangement the Sanskrit phoneticians fixed by place of articulation.
Related To
Ranjana Vocalic Ll and Devanagari Vocalic Ll hold the same position in the inherited varnamala and write the same sound, as separate northern Brahmi descendants rather than as variants of one script. Devanagari is the relative most readers know, so the two charts can be read against each other.
The same letter of the same order in Devanagari. The two scripts are separate descendants of the same late Brahmi stock rather than one being taken from the other, which is why the sound value and the position agree while the shapes do not.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.