Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Da ད

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Da is the eleventh of the thirty consonants and the voiced member of the dental line, a voiced d in the classical language and an unaspirated dental with low tone in modern Lhasa speech. It carries more orthographic work than almost any other letter: it is one of the five prefixes, one of the ten suffixes, and in classical spelling the second suffix known as the da drag, a d written after another final consonant. The da drag was dropped from ordinary orthography in the later tradition and survives mainly in canonical and archaic texts, so its presence in a manuscript is one of the small signs by which a reader dates a hand.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable da itself, the voiced member of the dental line. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Eleventh of the thirty consonants, and the voiced member of the dental line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
One of the five prefixes, one of the ten suffixes, and the classical second suffix, the da drag 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiced dental stop in Classical Tibetan; unaspirated with low tone as an initial in modern Lhasa speech 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The da drag, a second suffix d written after another final, was dropped from ordinary later orthography and survives mainly in canonical and archaic spellings 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan orthography
Learn More
Da and Its Three Offices

Da is the eleventh of the thirty consonants and the voiced member of the dental line, a voiced d in the classical language and an unaspirated dental with low tone in modern Lhasa speech.

It carries more orthographic work than almost any other letter in the script. It is one of the five prefixes, standing in front of a root letter without being pronounced. It is one of the ten suffixes, closing a syllable. And in the classical language it was also the second suffix, a d written after another final consonant, known as the da drag or strong da. Three offices, none of them audible in the modern standard language, all of them written.

The consequence for a reader is that a da in a Tibetan syllable has to be placed before it can be read. Is it the root letter, or is it standing in front of one? Is it closing the syllable, or is it sitting after the letter that closes it? The answer determines the pronunciation, the tone and the meaning, and it is settled by knowing which letters may occupy which slots rather than by anything in the shape of the da itself.

This is the general condition of Tibetan writing rather than a peculiarity of one letter, but da is where it is most concentrated, and a grammar demonstrating the slot system will very often demonstrate it with da.

The Da Drag and the Dating of a Hand

The classical language allowed a second suffix, a da written after a final consonant that had already closed the syllable. It is called the da drag, the strong da. It was never pronounced in the way an initial da is, and in the later orthography it was dropped from ordinary spelling altogether.

It did not vanish. It survives in canonical texts, in archaic and imperial-period documents, and in manuscripts copied from old exemplars by scribes who reproduced what was in front of them. So the presence of a da drag in a text is a signal, and a reader who notices it learns something about where the text has come from before reading a word of its content.

It is one of several such signals. Old Tibetan orthography has a small set of features that later spelling gave up: the reversed form of the vowel sign i, certain subscript combinations, particular spellings of common particles, and the da drag among them. Together they let a manuscript be placed in a rough relation to the great standardisations of the language, the revisions of vocabulary and spelling undertaken to regularise Buddhist translation.

None of this is decorative. Tibetan spelling was standardised deliberately, by decision and at a known period, and the archaisms are what the standardisation left behind. A scribe reproducing them is transmitting a text older than the rules being taught in his own day.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan da continues the Brahmi da, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Da answers to Brahmi's dental Da, the voiced member; Tibetan drops the intervening voiced aspirate Dha, matching the same pruning as the velar and palatal lines.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.