Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Brahmi Da 𑀤

Brahmi Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Mature Brahmi is securely attested in the edicts of Ashoka in the middle of the third century BCE, and the script could be read again only after James Prinsep worked out its values in 1837

Da is the voiced unaspirated dental stop, the third member of the fourth class and among the most frequent consonants in the languages the script records. Its sign is one that the later scripts changed relatively little, and the family resemblance between the Brahmi letter and its descendants across the subcontinent is easier to see here than in many other places in the alphabet. Like every consonant it carries the inherent short a, and where it meets another consonant with no vowel between, the two are written as a single conjunct rather than as two signs in sequence. Comparing one letter across the descendant scripts is the ordinary method of Indian palaeography, and the dating of an undated inscription rests on exactly such comparisons of shape.

Facts
Disputed
Origin Period
Many epigraphists derive Brahmi from a Semitic prototype, most often Aramaic, adapted in the centuries before the Mauryan empire 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Brahmi's ancestry is disputed among epigraphists. Richard Salomon's Indian Epigraphy (Oxford University Press, 1998) surveys two live positions on the origin of the script attested in the Ashokan inscriptions: one derives Brahmi from a Semitic prototype, most often Aramaic, adapted in the centuries before the Mauryan empire; the other holds that it developed inside India itself. The dispute turns on the corpus, since Brahmi is securely attested only from Ashoka's edicts in the middle of the third century BCE onward, first read again by James Prinsep in 1837, and no earlier specimen on either side is securely dated. Both camps compare Brahmi's letterforms against Aramaic and other Semitic scripts using the same paleographic method, and without an intermediate dated example bridging the gap between any proposed ancestor and the Mauryan era script, neither derivation has been shown to fit the evidence better than the other.
Origin Period
Others argue for a development inside India, and with no securely dated specimen earlier than the edicts the question stays open 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Brahmi's ancestry is disputed among epigraphists. Richard Salomon's Indian Epigraphy (Oxford University Press, 1998) surveys two live positions on the origin of the script attested in the Ashokan inscriptions: one derives Brahmi from a Semitic prototype, most often Aramaic, adapted in the centuries before the Mauryan empire; the other holds that it developed inside India itself. The dispute turns on the corpus, since Brahmi is securely attested only from Ashoka's edicts in the middle of the third century BCE onward, first read again by James Prinsep in 1837, and no earlier specimen on either side is securely dated. Both camps compare Brahmi's letterforms against Aramaic and other Semitic scripts using the same paleographic method, and without an intermediate dated example bridging the gap between any proposed ancestor and the Mauryan era script, neither derivation has been shown to fit the evidence better than the other.
Origins
Origin Period
Mature Brahmi is securely attested in the edicts of Ashoka in the middle of the third century BCE, and the script could be read again only after James Prinsep worked out its values in 1837 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Place of Origin
The Indian subcontinent. The Ashokan edicts carry the script from the Gangetic plain across the Deccan to the far south, while the northwest of the same empire wrote in Kharosthi instead 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Origin of the Name
The letter has no traditional name of its own. It is called by its own sound plus the inherent short a, and the form used here is the name the Unicode Standard gives the character 3Tradition: Modern scholarly naming of the Brahmi letters
Sense of the Name
the voiced unaspirated dental; eighteenth consonant of the Brahmi order 3Tradition: Modern scholarly naming of the Brahmi letters
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Attested from the Asokan rock and pillar edicts of the third century BCE, the earliest substantial Brahmi corpus. 2
Identity
Script Type
An abugida: every consonant sign carries an inherent short a, which a vowel mark alters and the virama cancels, so the unit written is the syllable rather than the single sound 1Tradition: Comparative writing systems
Position
Eighteenth consonant of the Brahmi order and third member of the dental class 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
How the Letter Joins
Consonants that meet with no vowel between them are written as a conjunct, the second stacked beneath or ligatured to the first, rather than as two separate signs 1Tradition: Comparative writing systems
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiced unaspirated dental stop, among the most frequent consonants in Sanskrit and in the Prakrit of the inscriptions 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The letter belongs to the received Brahmi order, and the corresponding sign in the scripts descended from Brahmi across South and Southeast Asia goes back to it 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Learn More
The Word That Cracked the Script

The Sanskrit root meaning to give begins with this letter, and its derived noun, the word for a gift or a donation, is the single most important word in the history of reading Brahmi. When James Prinsep worked out the values of the letters in 1837 he did it not from the great Ashokan edicts but from the short records cut into the railings at Sanchi, dozens of them, each naming a donor and closing with that word. A formula repeating with only the names changing is exactly what a decipherer needs, because the constant part can be guessed and the variable part then tested against it.

The same root supplies a great deal of ordinary vocabulary, and the giving of gifts to religious communities is the subject of most of the earliest Brahmi inscriptions there are. The donative record is the characteristic early Indian inscription: a monk, a merchant, a guild or a queen gives a pillar, a railing, a cave or a cistern, and the fact is cut where the gift stands. Thousands survive.

That means the corpus a palaeographer works from is heavily shaped by a single social practice. What early Brahmi records in bulk is not literature, law or narrative but the naming of donors, and the vocabulary of the surviving material is correspondingly narrow. Letters that occur in the donative formula are attested in thousands of examples; letters that do not are far harder to date.

A Shape That Barely Moved

This is one of the letters whose descent through the family is easiest to follow. Its Brahmi form is simple, its later forms across the northern and southern branches keep a visible family resemblance, and a reader who knows a modern Indic alphabet can often recognise the ancestor without being told. That is not true everywhere in the script: several letters changed past recognition, and the conjuncts changed more than the simple letters did.

Comparing one letter across the descendants is the ordinary working method of Indian palaeography, and it produces a picture with two main branches. The northern line runs through the Gupta hands into Siddham, which carried Buddhist texts to China and Japan and is still used there for writing mantras, and into the Nagari group that produced Devanagari, and separately into Sharada in the northwest and the scripts of the Himalayan region. The southern line produces Grantha, from which the Tamil and Malayalam alphabets descend, and the Kannada and Telugu pair, and Sinhala.

A third path runs out of the subcontinent altogether. The chancery script of the Pallava dynasty travelled with Indian religion and Indian administration into mainland and island Southeast Asia and stands behind the Khmer, Mon, Burmese, Thai, Lao, Javanese and Balinese writing systems, which is why this letter has descendants in a dozen countries where no Indian language has ever been spoken.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived from This

The Gurmukhi letter Dadda continues the sign Brahmi Da writes in the same place of the inherited series. The descent is not direct: it runs through the Sharada script of the northwest and then the Landa hands of the Punjab, and it is stated from position in the order rather than from shape.

Devanagari Da descends from the Brahmi sign of the same value, through the Gupta and Nagari hands of northern India. The two alphabets align letter for letter because both are laid out in the varnamala order, the arrangement the Sanskrit phoneticians fixed by place of articulation.

Ranjana Da continues the sign Brahmi Da writes in the same place of the inherited varnamala. The descent is not direct: it runs through the Gupta and Siddhamatrka stages of the northern Brahmi line and then the scripts of Nepal, and it is stated from position in the order rather than from shape.

Siddham continues the Brahmi order letter for letter. The descent runs through the late Brahmi of the Gupta period and the Siddhamatrka hand that grows out of it, so this is a lineage rather than a direct copy of the older shape.

Tibetan da continues the Brahmi da, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Aspiration partners in the dental class. Both are voiced, and the second is released with the breathy voice that Sanskrit kept where most of its relatives lost it.

The nasal of the dental class. Both are voiced and both are made with the tip of the tongue against the back of the upper teeth, the nasal differing in that the closure is released through the nose.

Voicing partners in the dental class. Both are unaspirated stops made with the tip of the tongue against the back of the upper teeth, and the vocal folds vibrate through the closure of the second.

Opposite corners of the dental class, the fourth of the five groups of five. Between them the two carry one feature each from the pair the table is built on.

Da answers to Brahmi's dental Da, the voiced member; Tibetan drops the intervening voiced aspirate Dha, matching the same pruning as the velar and palatal lines.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
2. Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
3. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language and the Older Dialects of Veda and Brahmana
William Dwight Whitney, Breitkopf and Hartel, 1889View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.