Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Armanen Runes

Nauth

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1902 to 1908

Nauth is the eighth Armanen rune, from the Younger Futhark naud, need. The rune poems agree that need is a hard master which nonetheless serves those who heed it early, and here List stayed close to the tradition, reading the rune as necessity, compulsion, and the working of fate through constraint. He tied it to the Norns and to a doctrine of destiny in which what binds a person is also what shapes them, and glossed it with the maxim that one should use one's fate rather than resist it. Armanen readers draw Nauth for hardship that is instructive, for the limits of a situation, and for obligations that cannot be evaded.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1902 to 1908 2Tradition: Armanen system (Guido von List)
Origin Period
800 to 1100 CE 1Tradition: Younger Futhark, the historical row von List built on
Origin Period
Sixteen of the eighteen Armanen characters adapt the historical Younger Futhark script, in documented use across Scandinavia from about 800 to 1100 CE. The row itself was published by the Austrian occultist Guido von List, first as a periodical article in 1906 and then in full as Das Geheimnis der Runen in 1908. 2
Place of Origin
Vienna, Austria-Hungary. 2
Attributed Author / Compiler
Guido von List (1848-1919). He published the row as a periodical article in 1906 and as Das Geheimnis der Runen in 1908, and did not present it as an invention: his claim was that he had recovered the secret alphabet of an 'Armanen' priest-king caste of a pre-Christian Aryan civilisation. No trace of such a caste exists in any source. 2
Origin of the Name
Adapted from the historical Scandinavian rune name naudr, 'need'. Sixteen of the eighteen Armanen characters are the Younger Futhark, the row genuinely used across Scandinavia in the Viking Age, and their names are largely the historical Scandinavian names, sometimes lightly altered. The meanings von List attached to them are new. 2
Language
German 2
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
The Armanen row was formulated inside an Austrian volkisch milieu, was taken up by the Germanenorden and by later Ariosophical and SS-adjacent runic enthusiasts, and is today used both in ordinary modern esotericism and on the far right. The row itself does not distinguish the two, which is why its origin has to be stated rather than assumed. 2
Order
Position in the Sequence
1
Attributions
Associated Sound
1
Learn More
The Armanen Rune Nauth

Nauth is one of the eighteen Armanen runes, the runic row devised by the Austrian occultist Guido von List and published in his Das Geheimnis der Runen (The Secret of the Runes) in 1908, developing ideas he had begun to set out from about 1902. It is given the sound-value N.

The rune and its meaning

Von List did not recover an ancient alphabet. He built his eighteen runes on the sixteen characters of the Younger Futhark, expanded to eighteen to match the eighteen rune-charms of the Havamal in the Poetic Edda, and assigned to each a mystical meaning of his own. In his system Nauth stands for need and the need-fire, the working of the Norns and of fate; the compulsion of necessity, and the counsel to master rather than resist it.

These readings are von List's early twentieth-century esoteric invention, not the meanings of the historical Viking-age runes, and are described here as such. The Armanen system was later taken up by volkisch and, in the 1930s and 1940s, National Socialist circles; that political appropriation is a separate and widely condemned chapter, and forms no part of the historical or comparative study of the row set out here.

What von List Took for Nauth

The eighteen Armanen runes are the work of Guido von List, published in 1908. Describing one honestly means naming the historical character underneath and the changes he made.

The character behind it

Nauth corresponds to the Younger Futhark character whose Old Norse name was naud, meaning need, distress or constraint. All three of the medieval rune poems treat their equivalent character in this register: hardship, a hard choice, something endured. It is one of the few runes whose gloss is consistent across the Norse and English traditions.

What von List did with it

He kept the N value, Germanised the name, and fitted the character into his own scheme of eighteen. Where the historical glosses were already consistent he had less room to reinterpret, which makes this one of the runes where his row and the medieval material sit closest to one another.

The frame around the whole row

Von List described the eighteen as an ancient Germanic priestly alphabet that he had recovered, and set the count to match the eighteen rune-charms of the Havamal. No historical futhark has eighteen characters. Runologists treat the row as an esoteric construction of the early twentieth century.

Reception

The row was afterwards taken up in volkisch circles and by National Socialist organisations in the 1930s and 1940s, a documented history that this atlas records rather than passing over.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Attributed To

Devised by von List, by his own account during the temporary blindness following his 1902 cataract surgery, and published in Das Geheimnis der Runen in 1908.

Contained In

One of the eighteen runes of the Armanen row.

Derived From

Nauthiz, Runes

Von List's Nauth (N) derives from the Elder Futhark Nauthiz (need, constraint).

Disciplines That Use This

Runes, Disciplines

The Armanen row, a twentieth century system rather than a historical futhark.

Originates in Language

Sources
1. Runes: A Handbook
Michael P. Barnes, The Boydell Press, 2012On the sixteen-character Younger FutharkView the Source
2. The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Aquarian Press, 1985Part I, on Guido von List and the Armanist revivalView the Source
Das Geheimnis der Runen (The Secret of the Runes)
Guido von List, Guido-von-List-Gesellschaft, 1908The eighteen Armanen runes, no. 8View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.