Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

William Jones Notices a Kinship No One Had Proven Before

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
William Jones Notices a Kinship No One Had Proven Before

Historical linguistics compares vocabulary and grammatical structure systematically across languages to establish genuine genetic relationship and reconstruct a shared ancestor language, rather than relying on superficial resemblance between words that can arise by coincidence or borrowing. The British judge and philologist William Jones set the discipline in motion in a 1786 address to the Asiatic Society of Bengal, arguing from systematic grammatical comparison that Sanskrit, Greek and Latin shared a common source no longer extant, a claim that could not be dismissed as coincidence given the depth and structure of the resemblance, and that launched the comparative method later linguists formalized into a rigorous discipline.

A scripture's or a liturgical tradition's own language carries a documented genetic history, and historical linguistics is what establishes which family a language actually belongs to and what that placement can and cannot say about a text's age or origin, independent of a tradition's own account of its scripture's language as unique or divinely given. The atlas relies on the discipline wherever a claim rests on a scripture's language being related, or unrelated, to another tradition's.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.