Home›Articles›Jones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common AncestorArticlesJones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common AncestorCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Jones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common Ancestor." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sanskrit-philology-jones-addresses-the-asiatic-society-and-names-a-lost-common-ancestor.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Jones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common Ancestor. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sanskrit-philology-jones-addresses-the-asiatic-society-and-names-a-lost-common-ancestorCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-jones-addresses-the-asiatic-society-and, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Jones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common Ancestor}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sanskrit-philology-jones-addresses-the-asiatic-society-and-names-a-lost-common-ancestor}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreJones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common Ancestor Sanskrit philology studies the language and textual transmission of Sanskrit literature from the Vedas onward, establishing what a passage most plausibly meant in its original context and how its text has varied across manuscripts. The British judge and orientalist William Jones delivered his Third Anniversary Discourse to the Asiatic Society in Calcutta on 2 February 1786, arguing that Sanskrit bore too strong a structural resemblance to Greek and Latin, in verb roots and grammatical forms, for the likeness to be accidental, and that all three must have sprung from a common source that no longer existed, the founding statement of comparative Indo-European linguistics. Jones's discourse gave Sanskrit philology both its founding method, systematic grammatical comparison rather than casual resemblance, and its larger significance beyond India alone, since establishing Sanskrit's place in a documented language family is what lets scholars date and cross check Vedic and later Sanskrit religious texts against a much wider comparative record. The atlas relies on Sanskrit philology wherever a Vedic, Puranic or classical Sanskrit passage's precise meaning or textual history bears on a claim about early Hindu or Buddhist doctrine.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnSanskrit Philology, Scholarly Disciplines Well-attested Source The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European WorldJ. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adamstier 1SourcesThe Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European Worldtier 1J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, Oxford University Press, 2006Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year