Home›Articles›A Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai SchoolsArticlesA Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai SchoolsArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai Schools." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/srivaishnavism-srimediation-vadakalai-tenkalai-divide.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai Schools. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/srivaishnavism-srimediation-vadakalai-tenkalai-divideCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-question-that-divides-the-vadakalai-an, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai Schools}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/srivaishnavism-srimediation-vadakalai-tenkalai-divide}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai Schools Exactly how far Sri's mediation goes is one of the questions on which the Sri Vaishnava tradition's own two schools divide, a dispute John Carman's study traces to differing readings of what her intercession requires from the soul. The Vadakalai school, following Vedanta Desika, holds that Sri's mediation, while genuinely effective, still leaves the soul's own effort a necessary part of surrender, illustrated by the markata nyaya, the logic of the monkey, whose infant must actively cling to its mother's body as she carries it. The Tenkalai school, following Manavala Mamuni and the earlier teacher Pillai Lokacharya, holds prapatti as accomplished entirely through Sri and Vishnu's own grace with no effort required of the soul at all, illustrated by the marjara nyaya, the logic of the cat, whose kitten is carried passively in its mother's mouth. Bound up with this same disagreement is the further question, unresolved between the schools, of whether Sri is herself divine in the same sense Vishnu is or a soul of an exceptionally exalted kind, since the two positions imply different accounts of how her mediation could work without either compromising Vishnu's supremacy or reducing her intercession to a merely symbolic role.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnSri Mediates Between the Soul and Vishnu, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source The Srivaisnava Theological Dispute: Manavalamamuni and Vedanta DesikaPatricia Y. Mummetier 1SourcesThe Srivaisnava Theological Dispute: Manavalamamuni and Vedanta Desikatier 1Patricia Y. Mumme, New Era Publications, Madras, 1988Carman's The Srivaisnava Theological Dispute, on the monkey logic and cat logic schoolsThe Theology of Ramanuja: An Essay in Interreligious Understandingtier 1John B. Carman, Yale University Press, 1974The Theology of Ramanuja, corroborating the unresolved question of Sri's own divine statusView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year